Change in gravitational potential below the surface of the Earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational potential below the surface of the Earth, specifically how it changes as one moves deeper into the Earth. The original poster attempts to understand the behavior of gravitational potential, questioning its value at the center of the Earth and the implications of mass distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational potential and distance from the center of the Earth, with some questioning the assumption that potential reaches zero at the center. Others suggest that potential continues to decrease, albeit at a slower rate.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and references to external materials. There is a focus on clarifying misconceptions about gravitational potential and its behavior inside a mass, but no consensus has been reached regarding the exact nature of the potential at the center of the Earth.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption of a homogeneous Earth and are discussing the implications of gravitational potential without delving into calculus, although some reference integral approaches for a more rigorous understanding.

MBBphys
Gold Member
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi,
Infinitely far away from a mass-->gravitational potential is zero.
As get closer-->becomes negative.
At surface-->it is the smallest value of r, i.e. the radius of the mass, hence the most negative value for gravitational potential.
But as you go below surface of Earth (say Earth is the mass, and the only mass), what happens to the value of gravitational potential as you go below surface of the Earth?

Homework Equations


V=-GM/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that, as the mass decreases by a cubic factor (volume), but the radius decreases by a linear factor, then the gravitational potential would increase (become more positive) by a factor to the power of 2, reaching zero at centre of earth?

Is this right?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Afraid not. Why would the potential be zero at the center ? Gravitation force IS zero there, though.

Compare (897) here with (4.10.3) http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/materials/StudyGuide/guide04.pdf
 
BvU said:
Afraid not. Why would the potential be zero at the center ? Gravitation force IS zero there, though.

Compare (897) here with (4.10.3) http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/materials/StudyGuide/guide04.pdf
Thanks for your reply. Could you explain why it is not zero? As in, what would it be? A non-zero finite negative value? Infinite? What would it be?
 
MBBphys said:
what would it be?
Equation 897 at BvU's first link answers that. Just put r=0.

Once you move inside the radius of the Earth, the field gets weaker, but it is still directed towards the Earth's centre. So the potential must be still decreasing.
 
MBBphys said:

Homework Statement


Hi,
Infinitely far away from a mass-->gravitational potential is zero.
As get closer-->becomes negative.
At surface-->it is the smallest value of r, i.e. the radius of the mass, hence the most negative value for gravitational potential.
But as you go below surface of Earth (say Earth is the mass, and the only mass), what happens to the value of gravitational potential as you go below surface of the Earth?

Homework Equations


V=-GM/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that, as the mass decreases by a cubic factor (volume), but the radius decreases by a linear factor, then the gravitational potential would increase (become more positive) by a factor to the power of 2, reaching zero at centre of earth?

Is this right?
Thanks!

If you know calculus already, the proper way to solve this would be to express the potential as an integral of the force divided by the test mass:

$$V(r) = -\int_r^\infty\frac{GM(r)}{r^2}dr$$

While you're above the Earth's surface, M is constant and the integral is simply the integral of ##\frac{1}{r^2}##. When you're below you replace M by ##\frac{4}{3}\pi\rho r^3## (with ##\rho## density of the Earth, if we consider it homogeneous, which it isn't but let's not go there). So the integral does not explode at ##r=0## and has instead a finite value, but still, it's not zero.

Without calculus I'm not sure how you can derive the correct formula, but you can realize at least that the rate of change of the potential never changes sign. If the potential is zero at infinity and negative at the surface, it would take a repulsive force to bring it back to zero, and that never happens. Even when you're below the surface all the layers above you merely cancel out their attraction to zero, they don't pull you upwards. So the potential keeps becoming more negative, it simply does so at a slower rate and does not become infinitely negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K