Chaotic Eternal Inflation vs. False Vacuum Eternal Inflation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion contrasts Alan Guth's false vacuum model of inflation with Andrei Linde's chaotic eternal inflation theory. Guth's model describes a universe decaying into pocket universes from a false vacuum, leading to a multiverse with distinct physical laws in separate regions. In contrast, chaotic eternal inflation involves a scalar field potential, V = m * Phi ^2 / 2, where inflation persists as the scalar field, Phi, rolls down the potential energy curve, potentially resulting in eternal inflation if quantum fluctuations favor positive changes in Phi. The key distinction lies in the nature of space-time regions: false vacuum models create separate regions, while chaotic inflation suggests multiple regions within the same space-time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Alan Guth's false vacuum model
  • Familiarity with Andrei Linde's chaotic eternal inflation theory
  • Knowledge of scalar field potentials in cosmology
  • Basic grasp of quantum fluctuations and their implications in inflationary models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum fluctuations in inflationary cosmology
  • Study the mathematical formulation of scalar field potentials in cosmological models
  • Explore the concept of multiverse theories and their physical laws
  • Investigate the differences between true vacuum and false vacuum states in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and students of advanced physics interested in the mechanisms of cosmic inflation and the implications of different inflationary models on the structure of the universe.

edgepflow
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
I hope someone can help me understand some inflation principles.

In Alan Guth's popular book: The Inflationary Universe, he presents a schematic of a false vacuum universe decaying into pocket universes. The false vacuum expands exponentially as the pocket universes are continuously generated. The process continues into the future forever.

Now in the chaotic eternal inflation theory originally proposed by Linde, a scalar field potential (of the form V = m * Phi ^2 / 2) exists and inflation happens as the scalar field, Phi, rolls down the potential energy curve.

As Guth points out in his 2007 paper, in one Hubble time during inflation, the volume will increase by a factor of e^3 = 20. As the scalar field is rolling, quantum fluctuations may make the positive change in Phi greater than the classic decrease in Phi. So if the chance of this happening is > 1/20, then chaotic inflation is eternal.

This leads to my question. The false vacuum / pocket universe model seems to have a bunch of separate space time regions. But the choatic eternal inflation seems to be separate regions in the same space time. Is this correct?
 
Space news on Phys.org
My understanding is thatIn standard inflation, inflationary expansion occurred while the universe was in a false vacuum state, halting when the universe decayed to a true vacuum state becoming a general and inclusive phenomenon with homogeneity throughout, yielding a single expanding universe which is “our general reality” wherein the laws of physics are consistent throughout. The bubble universe model proposes that different regions of this inflationary universe (termed a multiverse) decayed to a true vacuum state at different times, with decaying regions corresponding to “sub”- universes not in causal contact with each other and resulting in different physical laws in different regions which are then subject to “selection” which determines each region’s components based upon (dependent on) the survivability of its quantum components within that region. The end result will be a finite number of universes with physical laws consistent within each region of spacetime. Variants of the bubble universe model postulate multiple false vacuum states, which result in lower-energy false-vacuum “progeny” universes spawned, which in turn produce true vacuum state progeny universes within themselves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K