Inflation lecture from Guth : why does d(ρ)/dt = 0 ?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DoobleD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation Lecture
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a lecture by Alan Guth on the concept of inflation in cosmology, specifically focusing on the relationship between the mass density of the Universe, ρ, and the energy density associated with a scalar field, V(Φ), during the inflationary phase. Participants explore the implications of the scalar field being at a false vacuum and its effect on the mass density over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the mass density ρ remains constant if the energy density V(Φ) is constant, given that ρ represents the mass density of the Universe.
  • Another participant suggests that if the false vacuum energy density is constant, then the mass density associated with it, V(Φ)/c², is also constant, but raises concerns about the contribution from primordial matter.
  • A later reply proposes that Guth's assumption of the Universe being dominated by the false vacuum may imply that the mass density ρ is primarily derived from the false vacuum energy density, neglecting other contributions.
  • Another participant notes that inflation would dilute any other contributions to the energy density, emphasizing that dark energy components dilute much slower than matter or radiation components.
  • It is mentioned that the end of inflation allows for the removal of other components, enabling the Universe to repopulate them through reheating.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of the false vacuum on mass density and whether other contributions to energy density can be neglected. There is no consensus on the interpretation of Guth's statements or the assumptions made during the inflationary period.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider the dominance of the false vacuum and its implications for mass density, as well as the effects of inflation on other energy density components. The discussion remains open to interpretation and lacks definitive conclusions.

DoobleD
Messages
259
Reaction score
20
I watched a video lecture from Alan Guth on inflation (undergrad level), and there is something in it I don't understand.

He first presents the inflation scalar field, Φ, which has an energy density associated with it, V(Φ). V(Φ) is stuck at a local minimum, at Φ = 0 (what is called a "false vaccum") :

23_Inflation_You_Tube.png


He then invoke an equation, derived earlier in the course, which relates the derivative with respect to time of the mass density of the Universe, ρ, to its pressure p :

23_Inflation_You_Tube_1.png


Then, at around 9:43 prof. Guth says that the left-hand side of the equation, d(ρ)/dt, is 0, because the scalar field is stuck at the false vacuum value. Leading to :

23_Inflation_You_Tube_2.png


Where u is the energy density of the Universe.

Here is what bugs me : ρ represents the mass density of the Universe, not the energy density of the false vaccum, V(Φ). I get that V(Φ) is constant, but why does that implies that the mass density ρ is also constant ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I realize that if the false vacuum energy density is constant, the mass density associated with it, V(Φ)/c2, is also constant. But what about the mass density from the primordial matter in the Universe ? This part shouldn't be constant.

BUT, actually, a bit later in the lecture, Guth says that we assume the Universe is dominated by the false vaccum. So, in the equation for d(ρ)/dt, maybe he is simply making the approximation that there is no matter in the Universe, so that ρ is pretty much only the masse density corresponding of the false vacuum energy density ?
 
Last edited:
Inflation would quickly dilute any other contribution to the energy density. You can also solve the Friedmann equations with several different components, but if you have a dark energy component, it will dilute much slower than a matter or radiation component. One of the points of inflation is that when it ends you have essentially gotten rid of all other components and you can start to repopulate them by reheating.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DoobleD
Orodruin said:
Inflation would quickly dilute any other contribution to the energy density. You can also solve the Friedmann equations with several different components, but if you have a dark energy component, it will dilute much slower than a matter or radiation component. One of the points of inflation is that when it ends you have essentially gotten rid of all other components and you can start to repopulate them by reheating.

Thank you, that answers the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K