Inflation lecture from Guth : why does d(ρ)/dt = 0 ?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DoobleD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation Lecture
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 2K views
DoobleD
Messages
259
Reaction score
20
I watched a video lecture from Alan Guth on inflation (undergrad level), and there is something in it I don't understand.

He first presents the inflation scalar field, Φ, which has an energy density associated with it, V(Φ). V(Φ) is stuck at a local minimum, at Φ = 0 (what is called a "false vaccum") :

23_Inflation_You_Tube.png


He then invoke an equation, derived earlier in the course, which relates the derivative with respect to time of the mass density of the Universe, ρ, to its pressure p :

23_Inflation_You_Tube_1.png


Then, at around 9:43 prof. Guth says that the left-hand side of the equation, d(ρ)/dt, is 0, because the scalar field is stuck at the false vacuum value. Leading to :

23_Inflation_You_Tube_2.png


Where u is the energy density of the Universe.

Here is what bugs me : ρ represents the mass density of the Universe, not the energy density of the false vaccum, V(Φ). I get that V(Φ) is constant, but why does that implies that the mass density ρ is also constant ?
 

Discussion

Astronomy news on Phys.org
I realize that if the false vacuum energy density is constant, the mass density associated with it, V(Φ)/c2, is also constant. But what about the mass density from the primordial matter in the Universe ? This part shouldn't be constant.

BUT, actually, a bit later in the lecture, Guth says that we assume the Universe is dominated by the false vaccum. So, in the equation for d(ρ)/dt, maybe he is simply making the approximation that there is no matter in the Universe, so that ρ is pretty much only the masse density corresponding of the false vacuum energy density ?
 
Last edited:
Inflation would quickly dilute any other contribution to the energy density. You can also solve the Friedmann equations with several different components, but if you have a dark energy component, it will dilute much slower than a matter or radiation component. One of the points of inflation is that when it ends you have essentially gotten rid of all other components and you can start to repopulate them by reheating.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DoobleD
Orodruin said:
Inflation would quickly dilute any other contribution to the energy density. You can also solve the Friedmann equations with several different components, but if you have a dark energy component, it will dilute much slower than a matter or radiation component. One of the points of inflation is that when it ends you have essentially gotten rid of all other components and you can start to repopulate them by reheating.

Thank you, that answers the question.