Chapman Kolmogorov Th. - generality?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kolmogorov
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Chapman-Kolmogorov equation is not universally applicable to all stochastic processes, as clarified in the discussion. The Wikipedia article on "Stochastic process" indicates that the equation's validity depends on the class of the stochastic process, specifically noting that it holds for Wiener processes but not in general. C.W. Gardiner's "Handbook of Stochastic Methods" provides a marginalization proof for the equation, although he does not label it as the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the Markov assumption in relation to the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stochastic processes
  • Familiarity with the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation
  • Knowledge of Wiener processes
  • Basic concepts of probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Markov assumption in stochastic processes
  • Read C.W. Gardiner's "Handbook of Stochastic Methods" for in-depth insights
  • Explore the differences between Gaussian distributions and other probability distributions
  • Investigate the conditions under which the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation holds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and researchers in stochastic processes who seek to deepen their understanding of the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation and its applicability across different types of stochastic processes.

Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,605
Does the Chapman - Kolmogorov equation hold for an arbitrary stochastic process?

The current wikipedia article on "Stochastic process" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_process ) seems to say that the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation is not valid for an arbitrary stochastic process.

I say "seems to say" since I can't interpret what the article means by "same class" in the passage:

Note that the obvious compatibility condition, namely, that this marginal probability distribution be in the same class as the one derived from the full-blown stochastic process, is not a requirement. Such a condition only holds, for example, if the stochastic process is a Wiener process (in which case the marginals are all gaussian distributions of the exponential class) but not in general for all stochastic processes. When this condition is expressed in terms of probability densities, the result is called the Chapman–Kolmogorov equation.
 
Whether the equation is true for an arbitrary process depends on what one calls "the Chapman-Kolmogorov Equation". In "Handbook Of Stochastic Methods" by C.W. Gardiner, second edition, pages 43-44, marginalization is a proof for the equation:

[tex]p(x_1,t_1) = \int dx_2 \ p(x_1,t_1; x_2, t_2)[/tex]

which corresponds to the equation in the current Wikipedia article given by:

[tex]p_{i_1,\ldots,i_{n-1}}(f_1,\ldots,f_{n-1})=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}p_{i_1,\ldots,i_n}(f_1,\ldots,f_n)\,df_n[/tex]

which that article calls "the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation".

However, Gardiner does not call that equation "the Chapman-Kolmogorov Equation".

Marginalization also proves the equation

[tex]p(x_1,t_1\ |\ x_3,t_3) = \int dx_2\ p(x_1,t_1; x_2,t_2|x_3,t_3)[/tex]
[tex]= \int dx_2\ p(x_1,t_1| x_2,t_2; x_3,t_3)\ p(x_2,t_2 | x_3,t_3)[/tex]

Gardiner says
This equation is also always valid. We now introduce the Markov assumption. If [itex]t_1 \ge t_2 \ge t_3[/itex] we can drop the [itex]t_3[/itex] dependence in the double conditioned probability and write

[tex]p(x_1,t_1 | x_3,t_3) = \int dx_2\ p(x_1,t_1| x_2,t_2) p(x_2,t_2| x_3,t_3)[/tex]

which is the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 456 ·
16
Replies
456
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K