Charasteristic function of integer valued distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if $\varphi$ is the characteristic function of an integer-valued distribution, the probability mass function can be computed using the formula $p(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} e^{-ikt}\varphi(t) dt$ for all integers $k$. Key to this proof is the integral property $\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{-ikt}e^{ilt}\; dt=2 \pi$ when $k=l$, and $0$ otherwise. The proof involves changing the order of integration and summation within the integral to derive the required result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of characteristic functions in probability theory
  • Familiarity with integer-valued distributions
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, specifically Fourier integrals
  • Ability to manipulate summations and integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of characteristic functions in probability distributions
  • Learn about Fourier transforms and their applications in probability theory
  • Explore integer-valued distributions and their probability mass functions
  • Practice changing the order of integration and summation in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students studying probability theory, particularly those interested in characteristic functions and integer-valued distributions.

bennyzadir
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
How to prove that if $\varphi$ is the characteristic function of an integer valued distribution, then the probability mass function can be computed as
$ p(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} e^{-ikt}\varphi(t) dt \;,\forall k \in \mathbb{Z} $

I would be really grateful if you could help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zadir said:
How to prove that if $\varphi$ is the characteristic function of an integer valued distribution, then the probability mass function can be computed as
$ p(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} e^{-ikt}\varphi(t) dt \;,\forall k \in \mathbb{Z} $

I would be really grateful if you could help me.

You need to know that:

\( \displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{-ikt}e^{ilt}\; dt=2 \pi\) if \(k=l\) and \(0\) otherwise.

Then you just change the order of integration and summation in \( \int_{-pi}^{\pi} e^{-kt}\phi(t)\; dt\) to get the required result.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
You need to know that:

\( \displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{-ikt}e^{ilt}\; dt=2 \pi\) if \(k=l\) and \(0\) otherwise.

Then you just change the order of integration and summation in \( \int_{-pi}^{\pi} e^{-kt}\phi(t)\; dt\) to get the required result.

CB

Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K