MHB Charasteristic function of integer valued distribution

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the probability mass function of an integer-valued distribution can be derived from its characteristic function using the formula p(k) = (1/2π) ∫ from -π to π e^(-ikt)φ(t) dt for all k in Z. Key to this proof is the integral property that states ∫ from -π to π e^(-ikt)e^(ilt) dt equals 2π when k equals l, and 0 otherwise. The approach involves changing the order of integration and summation in the integral of the characteristic function. Participants express gratitude for assistance in understanding this mathematical concept. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between characteristic functions and probability mass functions in integer-valued distributions.
bennyzadir
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
How to prove that if $\varphi$ is the characteristic function of an integer valued distribution, then the probability mass function can be computed as
$ p(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} e^{-ikt}\varphi(t) dt \;,\forall k \in \mathbb{Z} $

I would be really grateful if you could help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zadir said:
How to prove that if $\varphi$ is the characteristic function of an integer valued distribution, then the probability mass function can be computed as
$ p(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \cdot \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} e^{-ikt}\varphi(t) dt \;,\forall k \in \mathbb{Z} $

I would be really grateful if you could help me.

You need to know that:

\( \displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{-ikt}e^{ilt}\; dt=2 \pi\) if \(k=l\) and \(0\) otherwise.

Then you just change the order of integration and summation in \( \int_{-pi}^{\pi} e^{-kt}\phi(t)\; dt\) to get the required result.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
You need to know that:

\( \displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{-ikt}e^{ilt}\; dt=2 \pi\) if \(k=l\) and \(0\) otherwise.

Then you just change the order of integration and summation in \( \int_{-pi}^{\pi} e^{-kt}\phi(t)\; dt\) to get the required result.

CB

Thank you so much!
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K