Checking u-substitution for exponential integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
15 replies · 3K views
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
[tex]\int 2e^{2x} dx[/tex] Ok so I know that [tex]\int e^{u} du = e^{u} + C[/tex]. So we have [tex]2\int e^{2x} dx[/tex]. Now [tex]u = 2x, du = 2dx[/tex]. So [tex]dx = \frac{1}{2} du[/tex]. So now we have [tex]\int e^{2x} du = e^{2x} + C[/tex] Was my method correct?

[tex]\int e^{2x} dx[/tex] Ok for this [tex]u = 2x, du = 2dx[/tex]. So [tex]dx = \frac{1}{2} du[/tex]. So we have [tex]\frac{1}{2}\int e^{2x} du = \frac{1}{2} e^{2x} + C[/tex]. Is this correct?

[tex]\int 5x^{3}e^{x^{2}} dx[/tex] So [tex]u = x^{2} du = 2xdx[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first one yes,, can be verified by taking derivative of solution and seeing if you get back the integrand

second one is good too, just a constant multiple of first.

for third use integration by parts (hint: let [itex]u = x^2[/itex] and [itex]dv = x e^{x^2}[/itex])
 
Last edited:
Ok so [tex]\int 5x^{3}e^{x^{2}} dx[/tex] so [tex]u = x^2[/tex] which means [tex]du = 2xdx[/tex]. Does this mean that [tex]\frac{1}{2}\int e^{x^{2}} (2xdx) = \frac{1}{2} e^{x^{2}} + C[/tex] ?
 
the formula for integration by parts is given by

[tex]\int u dv = uv - \int v du[/tex]

so for this case letting
[tex]u = x^2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)[/tex]
[tex]du = 2x dx \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (2)[/tex]

and
[tex]dv = x e^{x^2}dx \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (3)[/tex]
[tex]\int dv = \int x e^{x^2}dx \ \ \ \ \ \ (4)[/tex]

making the substitution [itex]w = x^2[/itex] in (4) and solving for v you get
[tex]v = \frac{1}{2} e^{x^2}[/tex]

plugging it all into the equation for separation of variables then

[tex]\int 5 x^3 e^{x^2} dx = 5[\frac{1}{2} x^2 e^{x^2} - \int 2x \frac{1}{2} e^{x^2} dx][/tex]

try to do the rest
 
however we are supposed to do substitution not parts

also is:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{x+1} dx = \Ln(x+1) + C[/tex]?
[tex]\int \frac{1}{3-2x} dx = \frac{-1}{2} \Ln(3-2x) + C[/tex]
[tex]\int \frac{e^{2x} + e^{x} + 1}{e^{x}} = e^{x} -e^{-x} + x + 2C[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
courtrigrad said:
however we are supposed to do substitution not parts

also is:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{x+1} dx = \ln(x+1) + C[/tex]?
[tex]\int \frac{1}{3-2x} dx = \frac{-1}{2} \ln(3-2x) + C[/tex]
[tex]\int \frac{e^{2x} + e^{x} + 1}{e^{x}} = e^{x} -e^{-x} + x + 2C[/tex]?

note: improper format for natural log in latex

hint: try taking the derivative of your solutions, and see if they match the integrand
 
Last edited:
What happened to the logarithms...? :confused:

Is that
[tex]\int \frac{dx}{xx} =\int \frac{dx}{x^{2}} [/itex]<br /> <br /> ?<br /> <br /> Daniel.[/tex]
 
actually it is [tex]\int \frac{1}{x\ln x}[/tex] Ok so [tex]\int \frac{\ln x}{x} dx[/tex]. So [tex]u = \ln x[/tex] and [tex]du = \frac{1}{x} dx[/tex]. That means [tex]dx = xdu[/tex]. Is this correct?

Also for [tex]\int \frac{e^{2x} + e^{x} + 1}{e^{x}} = e^{x} -e^{-x} + x + 2C[/tex] I just divided through. Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Ok so for [tex]\int \frac{1}{x\ln x}[/tex] should I rewrite or just make [tex]u = \ln x[/tex]?

Thanks :smile:
 
ok so i got [tex]du = \frac{1}{x} dx[/tex] [tex]dx = xdu[/tex]. So now do I bring the x out in the front?I know the answer is [tex]\ln(\ln(x)))[/tex]

thanks
 
Last edited:
no need to do [tex]dx=xdu[/tex]. just substitute straight from [tex]\frac{1}{x}dx=du[/tex].

edit: add a [tex]+C[/tex] to [tex]ln(lnx)[/tex].

- kamataat
 
Last edited: