Chelyabinsk Meteor Strike: How Bright Was It?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TumblingDice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meteor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Chelyabinsk meteor strike, focusing on its brightness and the scientific observations made during the event. Participants share insights from a NOVA documentary and other video resources, exploring the meteor's characteristics and the methods used to analyze its path and brightness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights the use of municipal street cameras to track the meteor's path, noting the innovative method of using lamppost shadows as a reference.
  • Another participant mentions the meteor's incoming speed of 40,000 MPH and the explosion occurring at an altitude of about 15 miles, with an estimated energy release of 100 megatons of TNT.
  • There is a discussion about the cause of the light and explosion, with one participant stating it is due to a pressure bubble rather than atmospheric friction.
  • Several participants share links to video clips related to meteor observations, indicating interest in visual documentation of such events.
  • One participant expresses difficulty accessing the NOVA documentary in Australia, suggesting regional restrictions on content availability.
  • Another participant speculates about the brightness magnitude of the meteor, particularly its visibility in daylight conditions, and notes the challenge of estimating this from videos.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the significance of the meteor's brightness and the innovative methods used for its observation. However, there are unresolved questions regarding the specific magnitude of brightness and the accessibility of related video content in different regions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the methods used to estimate the meteor's brightness from videos, indicating a lack of consensus on this aspect.

TumblingDice
Gold Member
Messages
471
Reaction score
47
I was flipping through the new releases on Netflix this morning when I pleasantly stumbled across a NOVA documentary that aired on PBS last year. If you haven't seen it and have Netflix, I recommend checking it out.

"NOVA: Meteor Strike"

Excellent video clips, tracking, data analysis, and entertaining, too. I learned more than a few highly interesting gems and tidbits. One team of scientists on the other side of the globe were computing the path from videos - but not from the ones you might expect. They had footage from several municipal street cams, and were using the lampposts on the streets - tracking their rapidly moving shadows from the light of the meteor kind of like sundials.

They said this was the most highly documented meteor strike of its kind by video, all due to the huge popularity of dash cams in Russian for legal protection and insurance purposes. (!)

The incoming speed was 40K MPH. :bugeye: Explosion took place at an altitude of about 15 miles. This caused a delay of three minutes between the visual show and the huge shock wave that caught people by surprise. I think they approximated at 100 megatons of TNT. I was extremely surprised to learn that the brilliant light and the explosion are not caused by high temps from atmospheric friction. When a puppy like this comes at us at 40K mph, it's the pressure bubble that forms in front of the leading edge of the meteor that super heats the atmosphere and precipitates both the light and the stress the ultimately causes the explosion.

The program was a great ride for me, as you can probably tell. :wink:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
Yes this was an awesome tour of science observation and detection:

http://video.pbs.org/video/2358778286/

cant view that one in Australia ... probably only those in the USA can

Dave
 
davenn said:
brilliant ... pun intended

really gives you an idea of its brightness when it is still visible passing within a degree of the sun!Dave

Yea; that's what I was thinking...brilliant in full daylight at full sun...was wondering what magnitude it reached...seems hard to estimate from videos.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K