Chemical equilibrium, getting molarity given pH and Kb

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the molarity of Trimethylamine in an aqueous solution given a specific pH and the base dissociation constant (Kb). Participants explore various methods for approaching the problem, including the use of ICE tables and stoichiometric relationships, while addressing the challenges posed by the lack of initial concentration data.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine the molarity of Trimethylamine given a pH of 11.2 and Kb value.
  • Another participant suggests using ICE tables to organize the information and solve for the unknown concentration.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the initial concentration and the use of ICE tables, indicating a lack of familiarity with the concept.
  • Discussion includes the idea of assuming arbitrary initial concentrations for species involved, which is challenged by another participant who suggests a more structured approach.
  • One participant outlines a method to express the changes in concentration using stoichiometry and sets up an equation based on Kb.
  • Participants engage in checking calculations, with one participant correcting their approach after realizing a mistake in the application of Kb.
  • There is a suggestion to calculate pH as a final check on the results, indicating a method for verifying the solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, with differing opinions on the use of ICE tables and assumptions about initial concentrations. Some participants express confidence in their methods, while others highlight potential errors in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of significant figures and the implications of calculated concentrations that appear unusually high, suggesting a need for careful verification of results.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning about chemical equilibrium, particularly those looking for methods to approach problems involving weak bases and pH calculations.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
What should be the molarity in an aquatic dissolution for Trimethylamine, ##(CH_3)_3N## if ##pH=11,2##?

##(CH_3)_3N+H_2O \rightleftharpoons (CH_3)_3NH^++OH^-##, ##K_b=6.3 \times 10^{-5}##

I know that ##pH+pOH=14 \rightarrow pOH=2.8##, then ##[OH^-]=1.58 \times 10^{-3}##

And ##K_b=\displaystyle\frac{ [ (CH_3)_3NH^+] [OH^-]}{[(CH_3)_3N]}## I used the approximation that water remains constant.
I think I should use some other approximation to get the concentration for ##(CH_3)_3N##, but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many ways to skin that cat. Do you know ICE tables?
 
Not really. We see all this really fast, we had only one class for this.

Now that I googled it and I know what I mean I think I saw some of these tables in examples in books. But the exercise don't give any information, I would expect to know the initial concentration or something.
 
In this case original concentration is your unknown. Pretend you use ICE table to calculate pH and use it to derive formula for the concentration of H+ (or OH- as it should make calculations easier) as a function of the concentration of trimethylamine. Then solve this formula for the concentration of trimethylamine - it will be the only unknown.

It is possible to solve the problem using approximate equations, but then you will have no idea what and why you are doing. ICE tables are much more general and can be applied to most typical equilibrium calculations.
 
Alright, I would like to try both ways. Where can I find an ICE table? an what approximation should I use?
 
Telemachus said:
Where can I find an ICE table?

ICE stands for Initial/Change/Equilibrium. Ask uncle google or aunt wikipedia for help.
 
Alright. I was thinking. Would it work just to suppose some arbitrary initial concentration for each species? let's say k, l, m. I thought of doing that using stoichiometry.
 
Why arbitrary? Assume concentration of the trimethylamine to be C, and other concentrations to be 0.
 
Nice!
 
  • #10
Ok, this is what I did. I know the concentration for ##[OH^-]## at equilibrium.
So I used that I have a concentration ##C_0## for trimethylamine that I want to find.
The changes given by the stoichiometry are -X for trimethylamine, +X for ##(CH)_3NH^+## and +X for ##[OH^-]##

Then, if initially there is only trimethylamine, the initial concentration ##[OH^-]_0=[(CH)_3NH^+]=0## and then in equilibrium the thrimethylamine concentration is given by ##[(CH)_3N]=C_0-X## and for the products ##[(CH)_3NH^+]=0+X## and ##0+X=[OH^-]\rightarrow X=1.58 \times 10^{-3}##

So, using the equilibrium constant:

##K_b=\displaystyle\frac{[(CH)_3NH^+][OH^-]}{[(CH)_3N]}=\frac{X1.58\times10^{-3}}{C_0-X}=6.3\times10^{-5}##

Then ##C_0=25.12M ## and at equilibrium ##[(CH)_3N]\approx C_0##

Is this fine?
 
  • #11
Check your math. In general you are on the right track, but for some reason you mixed X and 1.58x10-3 in the final equation (even if you know X=1.58x10-3) and your answer is wrong.

Whenever you see calculated concentration being higher than 2 or 3 M it should raise red flag for you.
 
  • #12
I've made the numbers again and it gave: ##C_0=1.04## I think I forgot to square ##1.58\times10^{-3}## in the last equality for Kb.

Thanks.
 
  • #13
This is still wrong.

As a final check you should try to calculate pH of the solution.
 
  • #14
This equation is fine?

##K_b=\displaystyle\frac{[(CH)_3NH^+][OH^-]}{[(CH)_3N]}=\frac{X1.58\times10^{-3}}{C_0-X}=6.3\times10^{-5}##

Alright, Iv'e tried again and get to ##C_0=0,04## I've forgot another product last time. Your purpose was that I should calculate pH from the initial concentration as a check? I'm not sure on how to do that, I should look for it in a book.

Thank you Borek.

BTW, can you help me with this one? https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=660731
 
Last edited:
  • #15
  • #16
Alright. Thank you Borek.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
28K