Chemical Garden, deeper conceptual explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishima
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the growth rates of metal salts in chemical gardens, specifically comparing cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate and iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate. It concludes that the growth process is primarily physical, influenced by factors such as the density of the metal silicate, osmotic processes, and the solubility of the salts in sodium silicate. The participants agree that the speed of water transport through the silicate membrane and the bond strength between metal cations and silicate play crucial roles in determining growth rates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical garden processes
  • Knowledge of metal salts and their solubility
  • Familiarity with osmotic processes in solutions
  • Basic principles of membrane permeability and mechanical strength
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the solubility rates of various metal salts in sodium silicate
  • Explore the relationship between bond strength and growth rates in chemical gardens
  • Investigate the structural properties of silicate membranes and their impact on permeability
  • Examine the role of hydration in the mechanical properties of silicate membranes
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, materials scientists, and educators interested in the physical processes of chemical gardens and the factors influencing the growth of metal salts.

mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
Hey there, I am curious why certain metal salts grow faster in a chemical garden. As I understand, the growth is more of a physical process than a chemical one. The difference in density causes the metal silicate to rise in solution, and osmotic processes inflate the tubes.

However, at least initially, I suspect how quickly the metal salt dissolves in the sodium silicate is proportional to how quickly the tubes grow.

I have observed for example that cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate grows faster than iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate. What could be the theoretical explanation for the difference in growth rate for these two substances?

There is not a lot of information on the actual process behind these gardens online. Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Just a personal opinion: probably the most important factor is the speed of water transport through the silicate membrane.
 
How would the type of metal affect this rate? Could it be proportional to the bond strength between the metal cation and the silicate? In other words a tighter lattice would slow the rate?
 
mishima said:
In other words a tighter lattice would slow the rate?

Yes, that's what I would expect, although I have no idea how to precisely quantify the "tightness". Different silicates can probably take different forms, arrangement of atoms in the membrane is probably to some extent ordered (as in crystals) and to some extent anisotropic, depending on the scale. These membranes are highly hydrated, so their properties are quite different from the crystalline silicates of respective metals.

Definitely mechanical strength and permeability of different membranes will vary, some combination of these will be responsible for how easily the membrane breaks and how fast the "branches" grow.
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
73K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
44K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K