Chemical Garden, deeper conceptual explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishima
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the growth rates of metal salts in chemical gardens, emphasizing that the process is primarily physical rather than chemical. Key factors influencing growth include the density of metal silicates, osmotic processes, and the solubility of metal salts in sodium silicate. Observations indicate that cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate grows faster than iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate, prompting inquiries into the theoretical reasons behind this discrepancy. The conversation suggests that the speed of water transport through the silicate membrane is crucial, potentially linked to the bond strength between metal cations and silicate. A tighter lattice structure may impede growth rates. Additionally, variations in mechanical strength and permeability of different silicate membranes are noted as significant factors affecting the growth dynamics of the branches in the chemical garden.
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
Hey there, I am curious why certain metal salts grow faster in a chemical garden. As I understand, the growth is more of a physical process than a chemical one. The difference in density causes the metal silicate to rise in solution, and osmotic processes inflate the tubes.

However, at least initially, I suspect how quickly the metal salt dissolves in the sodium silicate is proportional to how quickly the tubes grow.

I have observed for example that cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate grows faster than iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate. What could be the theoretical explanation for the difference in growth rate for these two substances?

There is not a lot of information on the actual process behind these gardens online. Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Just a personal opinion: probably the most important factor is the speed of water transport through the silicate membrane.
 
How would the type of metal affect this rate? Could it be proportional to the bond strength between the metal cation and the silicate? In other words a tighter lattice would slow the rate?
 
mishima said:
In other words a tighter lattice would slow the rate?

Yes, that's what I would expect, although I have no idea how to precisely quantify the "tightness". Different silicates can probably take different forms, arrangement of atoms in the membrane is probably to some extent ordered (as in crystals) and to some extent anisotropic, depending on the scale. These membranes are highly hydrated, so their properties are quite different from the crystalline silicates of respective metals.

Definitely mechanical strength and permeability of different membranes will vary, some combination of these will be responsible for how easily the membrane breaks and how fast the "branches" grow.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
72K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top