Chemists learn more about how life started on earth?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Messages
19,952
Reaction score
11,044
Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth
http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html

A team of chemists working at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, at Cambridge in the UK believes they have solved the mystery of how it was possible for life to begin on Earth over four billion years ago. In their paper published in the journal Nature Chemistry, the team describes how they were able to map reactions that produced two and three-carbon sugars, amino acids, ribonucleotides and glycerol—the material necessary for metabolism and for creating the building blocks of proteins and ribonucleic acid molecules and also for allowing for the creation of lipids that form cell membranes.

Here is the journal article
http://www.nature.com/nchem/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nchem.2202.html

55097cc7b29d5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth

Nope. The study does not claim to have solved the origin of life as the headline claims (to be fair, the headline is PhysOrg's fault, as I'm sure the authors of the study would not make that claim). The study does present a set of reactions that could potentially serve as the origin of biomolecules on Earth, which is still quite an impressive and important feat. The origin of life – how these biomolecules might organize into a living system – is a separate but related issue that is not addressed in the study.

There are reasons to think that the proposed sequence of reactions may not have been plausible on early Earth (for example, this article cites a researcher who questions whether high enough concentrations of cyanide would have been available), and there are other hypotheses for how these molecules could have formed (for example, a recent study used lasers to simulate the conditions of a meteorite impact and showed that such conditions could promote the formation of the nucleobases from formamide, though Sutherland's paper has the advantage in that his scheme produces nucleosides, not just nucleobases). This is very much an open area of research, and it will certainly take much thought and debate to sort through the various hypotheses out there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt