Chernobyl New Safe Confinement structure struck by drone… what now?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drone
AI Thread Summary
A suspected Russian drone struck the New Safe Confinement structure at Chernobyl, causing damage to its outer shell but reportedly not affecting the Sarcophagus or releasing radioactive material. Officials are closely monitoring the situation, with concerns about the long-term health of the structure and the need for extensive repairs. The incident raises questions about the engineering and technology responses required for nuclear facility protection. Participants emphasize the importance of focusing on technical aspects rather than political blame. The discussion aims to explore the implications of this unexpected event on nuclear safety.
Flyboy
Gold Member
Messages
423
Reaction score
626
Last night, a suspected Russian one-way drone with an explosive warhead impacted the New Safe Confinement shelter over the ruins of Chernobyl’s #4 reactor.

IMG_3991.jpeg

The explosion caused damage to at least the outer shell, with an unclear amount of damage to the interior of the facility.

IMG_3992.jpeg

Officials report no damage to the Sarcophagus within or any radioactive material having been released, and they are monitoring the situation closely.

There is concern about the long-term implications to the health of the NSC following this, as this was never something that was expected. Nor, as far as I understand, was there ever any plans for having to make repairs this extensive.

There’s a lot of unknowns right now, and lots of fingers being pointed by both Ukraine and Russia. Let’s keep the finger pointing between them, leave the politics elsewhere, and just look at the engineering and technology angle of how they’re going to respond to this unexpected (and deeply unwelcome) incident.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, Astranut, Greg Bernhardt and 2 others
Engineering news on Phys.org
Flyboy said:
There’s a lot of unknowns right now, and lots of fingers being pointed by both Ukraine and Russia. Let’s keep the finger pointing between them, leave the politics elsewhere, and just look at the engineering and technology angle of how they’re going to respond to this unexpected (and deeply unwelcome) incident.
Yes, agreed. This can be a valuable thread for discussing nuclear facility protection structures in real-life scenarios, but per the PF rules we need to keep political considerations out of this thread. Thanks folks.
 
  • Like
Likes Astranut and Flyboy
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top