Children Are Source Of Embarrassment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samalkhaiat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Children Source
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around explaining the concepts of balance and stability in bicycles, particularly focusing on why it is difficult to balance a stationary bike compared to a moving one. Participants explore how to convey these ideas without relying heavily on mathematical explanations, touching on related topics such as angular momentum and gyroscopic forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that balancing a stationary bike requires perfect weight distribution, while a moving bike benefits from angular momentum, making it harder to tip over.
  • Another participant proposes that the difficulty in balancing a stationary bike is due to the need to change the direction of the rubber particles on the tire, which is easier when the bike is moving.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the role of gyroscopic properties and precession in maintaining balance when the bike is in motion.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how to explain these concepts to a child, noting that while they can describe the phenomena, the explanations may not be comprehensible to an eight-year-old.
  • One participant shares a hands-on demonstration involving a spinning bicycle wheel to illustrate gyroscopic forces, suggesting it could help in understanding stability.
  • There are critiques of previous explanations, with some participants finding them unclear or overly complex.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best way to explain the concepts of balance and stability. Multiple competing views and explanations are presented, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the most effective communication of these ideas.

Contextual Notes

Some explanations rely on concepts that may not be intuitive without mathematical backing, and there is a recognition that certain terms and principles may exceed the understanding of a young audience. The discussion also highlights the challenge of conveying complex physical principles in simple terms.

  • #31
Krab says; "If you only understand it mathematically, then you don't really understand it...". Sir can you be kind & explain to me (not to my 8 years old gaughter) what is local gauge invariance means & how it works in field theory? I would love to see a "qualitative" explanation as to how this principle introduces interaction into the theory.
Thank you for the broom example! Can you do the same thing with the symmetrical spinning top? & tell me who order the littile toy to balance its centre of mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
You are aware, are you not, that children consider parents a source of embarassement?
 
  • #33
You are absolutely right, We are guilty of double crime. We accuse our parents as well as our kids of being a source embarassement. Yet we manage to get away with it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
864
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 198 ·
7
Replies
198
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K