I Chiral symmetries in E[SUP]^n[/SUP]

AI Thread Summary
Chirality plays a crucial role in biochemistry, particularly in the binding of small chiral molecules to larger ones like enzymes. In 2-D geometry, mirror-asymmetric figures, such as triangles with different side lengths, can exist without being superimposed through rigid transformations, akin to 3D chiral figures. The discussion extends to 1-D cases, where reflecting a directed line segment about a point results in a segment pointing in the opposite direction, illustrating analogs across dimensions. The conversation raises questions about extending these concepts to higher dimensions and other geometries, focusing on mappings that preserve the Euclidean inner product and their implications for orientation. Overall, the exploration of chiral symmetries in various dimensions reveals complex relationships between geometry and molecular behavior.
Mark Harder
Messages
246
Reaction score
60
As a biochemist, I deal with chirality of molecules all the time. If you have a tetrahedral molecule, for example a carbon atom, and all 4 vertices are labeled differently, as in different atoms on each one, then that molecule has a mirror-symmetric one that cannot be superimposed on the original. This makes a big difference when it comes to binding of small chiral molecules to big ones, esp. enzymes. What about 2-D geometry? Are there figures, triangles for example, that are mirror-asymetric? The answer is yes, provided they are confined to the plane they are in. Flipping over is not an allowed move, since the triangles are confined to E^2.
Try it. Draw a triangle with each side of a different length. Draw a straight line parallel to one of the edges (not necessary, but it makes visualizing easier) and outside the triangle. Now 'reflect' the triangle about this 1-D 'mirror', i.e. draw a triangle with vertices at the same distances from the mirror as the original. Now try to mentally rigidly rotate and translate the triangles so that they superimpose. You can't do it (without breaking the law and rotating in the 3rd dimension.) This is a 2D analog of 3D chiral figures and 2D mirrors. Not that the angles (disregarding their directions) and included sides are the same, satisfying Euclid's definition of congruency.
Now try the 1D case. Draw a directed line segment on the number line. Locate a point (a 0-D figure) on the line outside the directed segment and 'reflect' the directed segment about the point. The result will be a directed line segment pointed in the opposite direction from the original - a 1-D, 0-D analog of higher dimensions. Obviously, there is no example for 0-D figures.
So, my question is, can these examples be extended to higher dimensions? To n-D Euclidean spaces in general? What about other geometries?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The mappings from \mathbb{R}^n to itself which preserve the euclidean inner product are x \mapsto Ax + b where A^{-1} = A^T, so |\det A| = \pm 1. Those with \det A = -1 are reflections, which require "flipping" in an additional dimension.

In more general geometries, you can have distance- and angle-preserving mappings, which will either preserve orientation or reverse it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top