Is it true that classical theories tend to treat matter 'in the limit' of large N, or it encodes matter in [tex] N_A [/tex] as [tex] N_A(m_e,e) [/tex] say, and chiral theories need to include [tex]\hbar [/tex] which classicality sees as [tex] \{G(h),c\} [/tex]?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

We use 'mass-free' theories that treat charge and spin momentum in circuits = manifolds with linear/nonlinear operators.

Algebraically these manifolds can operate at linear (<<nonlinear) limits that treat charge algebraically and do not rotate spin or they operate in a N(e + s) domain that keeps N(s) at 0.

We need theories that include a mass-spin term?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Chiral theories and matter gauges

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**