Chiral theories and matter gauges

  • Thread starter sirchasm
  • Start date
  • #1
94
0
Is it true that classical theories tend to treat matter 'in the limit' of large N, or it encodes matter in [tex] N_A [/tex] as [tex] N_A(m_e,e) [/tex] say, and chiral theories need to include [tex]\hbar [/tex] which classicality sees as [tex] \{G(h),c\} [/tex]?

We use 'mass-free' theories that treat charge and spin momentum in circuits = manifolds with linear/nonlinear operators.
Algebraically these manifolds can operate at linear (<<nonlinear) limits that treat charge algebraically and do not rotate spin or they operate in a N(e + s) domain that keeps N(s) at 0.

We need theories that include a mass-spin term?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
94
0
that N(e + s) thing should be able to explain how N gauges charge e (in my notation), and spin-potential s, in a mass-free index; When we use much smaller N than [tex] N_A\, [/tex] of charge and spin,we see distributed phase momenta = discrete products.

We haven't been able to connect the enumerable side of Avogadro's number to the way spin and charge evolve over the 'mass-field', or extend algebraically.
 

Related Threads on Chiral theories and matter gauges

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Top