I Choice of basis in BB84 protocol

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter lys04
  • Start date Start date
lys04
Messages
144
Reaction score
5
In the BB84 protocol, we have two basis, the Z basis which consists of |0> and |1> which represents bit values of 0 and 1 respectively in the Z basis. From this we construct another basis, the X basis which consists of ##|+> = \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |0> + \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |1>## and ##|-> = \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |0> - \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |1>## which also represents bit values of 0 and 1 in the X basis.

The purpose of having two basis is to prevent the eavesdropper as the act of measurement in the wrong basis has a chance of changing the state and thus introduce errors which can be detected.
Technically taking any linear combination of the Z basis to form a new basis has this effect but choosing ##\frac{1}{\sqrt(2)}## means the probabilities are symmetric. If the probabilities weren’t symmetric, then this means the probabilities of detecting the Eve for one bit is higher than the other bit, so it’s kind of like a trade off between probabilities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lys04 said:
so it’s kind of like a trade off between probabilities?
It seems that way at first glance, but no. We detect Eve’s presence only when Alice and Bob find that the keys they have constructed don’t work because at least one bit doesn’t match. And the chances that Eve’s tampering will cause a mismatch are greatest when the axes are 90 degrees apart.
It may be easiest to see this by considering the limiting case in which all the bits are sent using the same axis - as long as Eve knows what that axis is the eavesdropping will be undetectable.
 
Nugatory said:
It seems that way at first glance, but no.
Why not
Would this be a valid example?
Suppose instead of the X basis was ##|+ \rangle = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{10}} |0 \rangle + \frac{\sqrt{8}}{\sqrt{10}} |1 \rangle ##
And Alice sends out a 0 encoded in the X basis i.e a ##| + \rangle## and the eve tries to intercept by making a measurement in the rectilinear basis. Then the eve has a probability of ##\frac{2}{10}## of measuring ##| 0 \rangle##, i.e 0, and a probability of ##\frac{8}{10}## measuring a ##|1 \rangle##.

The eve can be detected if he measures in the wrong basis and this results in the wrong bit value. In my definition of ##| + \rangle##, the eve has a probability ##\frac{4}{10}## of being detected. Therefore in n bits of 0's encoded in the X basis, the probability of not detecting the eve is ##\left( \frac{6}{10} \right)^n## and thus the probability of detecting the eve after comparing n qubits is ##1- \left( \frac{6}{10} \right) ^n## which if you compare to having symmetric probabilities which is ##1-\left( \frac{3}{4} \right) ^n##, it's higher.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top