I Choice of basis in BB84 protocol

  • Thread starter Thread starter lys04
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In the BB84 protocol, two bases are utilized: the Z basis, consisting of |0> and |1>, and the X basis, comprising |+> and |->, to enhance security against eavesdropping. The choice of basis is crucial, as measurements in the incorrect basis can alter the quantum state, leading to detectable errors. The symmetric probabilities of the X basis ensure that the likelihood of detecting an eavesdropper, Eve, remains consistent across bits. When Alice and Bob's keys mismatch, it indicates potential tampering, particularly when the measurement axes are orthogonal. Ultimately, the design of the protocol effectively balances the probabilities of detection and security against eavesdropping.
lys04
Messages
144
Reaction score
5
In the BB84 protocol, we have two basis, the Z basis which consists of |0> and |1> which represents bit values of 0 and 1 respectively in the Z basis. From this we construct another basis, the X basis which consists of ##|+> = \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |0> + \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |1>## and ##|-> = \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |0> - \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)} |1>## which also represents bit values of 0 and 1 in the X basis.

The purpose of having two basis is to prevent the eavesdropper as the act of measurement in the wrong basis has a chance of changing the state and thus introduce errors which can be detected.
Technically taking any linear combination of the Z basis to form a new basis has this effect but choosing ##\frac{1}{\sqrt(2)}## means the probabilities are symmetric. If the probabilities weren’t symmetric, then this means the probabilities of detecting the Eve for one bit is higher than the other bit, so it’s kind of like a trade off between probabilities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lys04 said:
so it’s kind of like a trade off between probabilities?
It seems that way at first glance, but no. We detect Eve’s presence only when Alice and Bob find that the keys they have constructed don’t work because at least one bit doesn’t match. And the chances that Eve’s tampering will cause a mismatch are greatest when the axes are 90 degrees apart.
It may be easiest to see this by considering the limiting case in which all the bits are sent using the same axis - as long as Eve knows what that axis is the eavesdropping will be undetectable.
 
Nugatory said:
It seems that way at first glance, but no.
Why not
Would this be a valid example?
Suppose instead of the X basis was ##|+ \rangle = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{10}} |0 \rangle + \frac{\sqrt{8}}{\sqrt{10}} |1 \rangle ##
And Alice sends out a 0 encoded in the X basis i.e a ##| + \rangle## and the eve tries to intercept by making a measurement in the rectilinear basis. Then the eve has a probability of ##\frac{2}{10}## of measuring ##| 0 \rangle##, i.e 0, and a probability of ##\frac{8}{10}## measuring a ##|1 \rangle##.

The eve can be detected if he measures in the wrong basis and this results in the wrong bit value. In my definition of ##| + \rangle##, the eve has a probability ##\frac{4}{10}## of being detected. Therefore in n bits of 0's encoded in the X basis, the probability of not detecting the eve is ##\left( \frac{6}{10} \right)^n## and thus the probability of detecting the eve after comparing n qubits is ##1- \left( \frac{6}{10} \right) ^n## which if you compare to having symmetric probabilities which is ##1-\left( \frac{3}{4} \right) ^n##, it's higher.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
670
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K