MHB Choose from the following set of vectors in R4

  • Thread starter Thread starter forzi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying the maximum number of linearly independent vectors from a given set in R4. The user initially calculates the rank of the matrix formed by the vectors as 4 but struggles to apply this to the question. They conclude that vectors 2, 3, 4, and 5 are independent after omitting vector 1, which is a multiple of vector 2. Another participant suggests that vectors 1, 3, 4, and 5 could also be a valid independent set, indicating multiple correct answers. Ultimately, the user confirms their answer was correct, despite their uncertainty about the reasoning.
forzi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I have a problem with this question:
Choose from the following set of vectors in R4 set of the maximum number of linearly independent vectors:
1.(1;2;3;4) 2.(2;4;6;8) 3.(0;1;-1;1) 4.(1;1;1;0) 5.(0;3;0;0)

So, I can find a rank of a matrix, it's 4, but I can't understand how it could help me answering my question.

Would you please help me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can just assume that cause second vector is equal 2*first vector, I can remove first vector from calculation and the answer will be 2,3,4,5
tBut it just an assumption.
 
Hi forzi and welcome to MHB! :D

I think you have the right idea but wouldn't one omit vectors 1. and 2.?
 
Hi greg

Thanks :)
I can't understand your question. But I can say that answer to my question is 2,3,4,5. I finished the test with this answer and it was right.
Have no idea why :confused:
 
Wouldn't vectors 1,3,4,5 be an equally good answer?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top