Choosing a Minor in Physics: Mathematics or Chemistry? Get Expert Advice

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A_B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubts Minor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of choosing a minor in either mathematics or chemistry for a physics major. Participants explore the implications of each choice in relation to their interests and future studies, particularly in the context of thermodynamics and the mathematical foundations necessary for advanced physics topics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in chemistry due to its relevance to physics, particularly thermodynamics, and perceives it as an easier option compared to mathematics.
  • Another participant argues for the importance of mathematics, highlighting the necessity of understanding analysis and algebra for advanced physics, particularly in areas like atomic physics and quantum mechanics.
  • It is noted that physics majors typically take many math courses, suggesting that a minor in mathematics may require only a few additional courses.
  • A suggestion is made that a chemistry minor could be beneficial for those interested in research fields such as condensed matter or biological physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the participant's proficiency in algebra, with a recommendation to improve proof skills through a specific textbook.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the merits of choosing mathematics versus chemistry as a minor. While some advocate for the mathematical route due to its foundational importance in physics, others see value in chemistry, particularly for its applicability in certain research areas. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on which minor is definitively better.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying levels of comfort and proficiency in mathematics, particularly in algebra and proofs, which may influence their decisions. The discussion reflects personal experiences and subjective evaluations of the difficulty and relevance of each minor.

A_B
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

I've completed my first year studying physics an now I have to choose a minor. I'm down to choosing between mathematics and chemistry, and I hope to get some advice from you guys.

The reason I'd study chemistry is because it's interesting, it blends quite well with physics (or so it seems to me) especially in the use of thermodynamics, which I find a very interesting subject. A minor in chemistry also seems easier then one in mathematics.

The reasons for choosing mathematics are also my interests, though perhaps not to the same extent as (some of the courses offered in) chemistry. Other than that it feels important to know analysis, to know what calculus really is. Also I know algebra is very important in modern physics. Studying mathematics will make me more comfortable with mathematics (duh) which should help me with physics in general. (You know, physics is always more fun when the mathematics doesn't consume all you attention and work.)

My grades for Calculus, and intro course to proofs (Combinatorics, little number theory, real numbers etc.) and linear algebra are (very) good, but for algebraic structures I had the absolute minimum passing grade, so algebra would be a little scary perhaps.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing you should keep in mind is that most physics majors have to take so many math courses that they're only a few courses away from a minor just by there nature, so the math minor might only require one or two more courses beyond what is already required by your physics major.

That said, a chemistry minor couldn't hurt and could potentially be helpful if you plan on going into research in condensed matter experiment or biological physics.
 
A_B said:
My grades for Calculus, and intro course to proofs (Combinatorics, little number theory, real numbers etc.) and linear algebra are (very) good, but for algebraic structures I had the absolute minimum passing grade, so algebra would be a little scary perhaps.

Your proofs are probably lacking. Try to read a book called How to prove it by Daniel Velleman.

Just take Maths. You going to find it very hard to do atomic physics, QM and mostly all of physics if you don't improve algebra. Just in atomic physics you need heavy group theory to understand the particle zoo.

Also, if your linear algebra is good then in away you probably just suck at proofs and that is easily fixed.
 
Thank you, simplicity123 and G01, that was very helpful.
I've started working through "How to prove it", and it is indeed illuminating to say the least. Upon seeing the subject matter of the first chapter I thought "pfffft, seriously, truth tables? I know all about that!" Well... obviously I didn't. I'm looking forward to reading the later chapters, thank a lot for that suggestion!.

Alex
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K