Circular motion kid-on-a-swing problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving circular motion, specifically calculating the speed of a child on a swing at the lowest point of the swing's arc. The mass of the child is 35 kg, and the swing reaches a maximum height at an angle of 55 degrees. The solution utilizes the principle of energy conservation, expressed as mgh = 0.5mv², where h is the height difference calculated as 0.8528 m. The participants clarify the correct application of energy conservation and the significance of mass in the equations used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles in physics
  • Basic trigonometry for calculating height and angles
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.81 m/s²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of energy conservation in different mechanical systems
  • Learn about the forces acting on objects in circular motion
  • Explore the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in physics problems
  • Investigate the role of mass in energy equations and how it affects motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of circular motion and energy conservation in real-world applications.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/4571/kidswing.jpg

Mass (m) of the kid sitting on the swing is 35 kg, and its center of gravity is at point C (the meeting place of the swing's arm EC with the arch p-r, created by the movement of the center of gravity of the kid). If the kid swings to a max height (when angle Psi is 55 degrees), calculate:

A) The speed of the swing as it passes point D (Psi = 0 degrees)

(There are other clauses but I really want to get A first)

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the same formula that I used in my last non-uniform circular motion. From some reason this time it didn't work!

http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/205/567wg.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is h?
And I was in the belief that g is about 9.8 m/s2.:smile:

ehild
 
And I was in the belief that g is about 9.8

Isn't this exactly what I wrote? 9.81?

h is delta y...oh wait, I need delta y not delta x. One moment.Okay, my delta y (or "h") should've been

2cos(55) = 1.147
h (or delta y) = 2-1.147 = 0.8528
 
I see "g=2cos(35) " written on the sheet of paper just below the triangle :smile:

That h should be delta y, you are right. And the angle is 55° instead of 35 which is the mass of the child. Getting the correct result?



ehild
 
the kid swings to max height and makes angle of 55
so now find the height of this point from the lowest point in its motion (where you need to find velocity) (use radius, if i see correctly its given 2m?)
use energy conservation ... mgh = 0.5mv2
 
use energy conservation

What is the difference between the formula I used and "energy conservation"? I was under the impression it's one and the same.

That h should be delta y, you are right. And the angle is 55° instead of 35 which is the mass of the child. Getting the correct result?

Yes, thank you, I also solved the other clauses asking me to calculate tension and reaction forces :) ! Mechanics is fun!
 
Femme_physics said:
What is the difference between the formula I used and "energy conservation"? I was under the impression it's one and the same.

sorry i didn't saw your answer :p
its same :)

anyway have you solved it now?
 
cupid.callin said:
the kid swings to max height and makes angle of 55
so now find the height of this point from the lowest point in its motion (where you need to find velocity) (use radius, if i see correctly its given 2m?)
use energy conservation ... mgh = 0.5mv2
Btw why did your equation for "energy conservation" has mass in it and mine doesn't?

anyway have you solved it now?

Yes :) Thank you. I even solved the following clauses asking for the tension and the reaction forces at each of the 4 support beams.

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/2180/physfor.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Femme_physics said:
Btw why did your equation for "energy conservation" has mass in it and mine doesn't?
they are same
mine has mass on both sides ... so they just gets cancelled.
 
  • #10
I see :) thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
35K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K