Circular Motion with Decreasing Radius

8 replies · 4K views · last reply
uSee2
Messages
57
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
One end of a string is attached to a ball, with the other end held by a student such that the ball is swung in a horizontal circular path of radius R at a constant tangential speed. At a later time, the tension force exerted on the ball remains constant, but the length of the string is decreased to R/4. What is the new tangential speed of the ball?
Relevant Equations
##F_c = \frac {mv^2} R##
The answer key states that the new tangential speed is half the original speed. However, this isn't correct right? It should double.

My proof:

##F_c = \frac {mv^2} R##
##F_c = F_t##
##\frac {mv^2} {\frac R 4} = \frac {m(2v)^2} R## If centripetal force were to stay constant.
As such, tangential velocity should double right? It should not half?
 
Your logic is faulty. The centripetal force is, as you say, ##F_c =\frac{mv^2}{R}.## For the fraction to remain constant, if the denominator is decreased by a factor of 4, the numerator must also decrease by a factor of 4. Since the speed in the numerator is squared (##v^2=v*v##), each of the v's must decrease by a factor of 2 when the radius is decreased by a factor of 4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: uSee2, scottdave and topsquark
kuruman said:
Your logic is faulty. The centripetal force is, as you say, ##F_c =\frac{mv^2}{R}.## For the fraction to remain constant, if the denominator is decreased by a factor of 4, the numerator must also decrease by a factor of 4. Since the speed in the numerator is squared (##v^2=v*v##) each of the v's must decrease by a factor of 2 when the radius is decreased by a factor of 4.
But couldn't the denominator decrease and the numerator increase instead and give the same ratio?

##\frac {mv^2} {\frac R 4} * \frac 4 4 = \frac {4mv^2} R##
Then it is equal to
##\frac {m(2v)^2} R##
Isn't this true?
 
uSee2 said:
But couldn't the denominator decrease and the numerator increase instead and give the same ratio?

##\frac {mv^2} {\frac R 4} * \frac 4 4 = \frac {4mv^2} R##
Then it is equal to
##\frac {m(2v)^2} R##
Isn't this true?
Try using two different symbols for the first velocity and the second velocity.

$$\frac {mv_1^2} {R} = \frac {mv_2^2} {\frac R 4}$$

Well I cannot get my Latex to display correctly, but try it on your own.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: uSee2 and TSny
uSee2 said:
But couldn't the denominator decrease and the numerator increase instead and give the same ratio?
No. The new ratio must be the same as the old ratio.
Old ratio = ##\frac{mv^2}{R}##.
New ratio (according to you) = ##\frac{m(2v)^2}{R}.##

Are they the same?
 
uSee2 said:
But couldn't the denominator decrease and the numerator increase instead and give the same ratio?

##\frac {mv^2} {\frac R 4} * \frac 4 4 = \frac {4mv^2} R##
Then it is equal to
##\frac {m(2v)^2} R##
Isn't this true?
Yes, and that is exactly what the answer key says. The new tangential speed, v, is half the original, 2v.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, and that is exactly what the answer key says. The new tangential speed, v, is half the original, 2v.
kuruman said:
No. The new ratio must be the same as the old ratio.
Old ratio = ##\frac{mv^2}{R}##.
New ratio (according to you) = ##\frac{m(2v)^2}{R}.##

Are they the same?
I do see that they aren't the same. But when I tried it again with different symbols just like @scottdave said:

2 is after the label for when radius is reduced, 1 is the label for before.

##F_{c2} = \frac {mv_2^2} {R_2}##

##F_{c1} = \frac {mv_1^2} {R_1}##

##F_{c1} = F_{c2}##

##R_2 = \frac 1 4 {R_1}##

##\frac {mv_1^2} {R_1}= \frac {mv_2^2} {R_2}##

##\frac {mv_1^2} {R_1}= \frac {mv_2^2} {\frac 1 4 R_1}## Substitution of ##R_2 = \frac 1 4 {R_1}##

Multiply each side by ##\frac {R_1} {m}##

##\frac {v_2^2} {\frac 1 4} = v_1^2##

##v_2^2 = 4v_1^2##

Take the square root of each side

##v_2 = 2v_1##

The new speed is double the original speed I think, I may have made an error though.
 
uSee2 said:
##\frac {v_2^2} {\frac 1 4} = v_1^2##

##v_2^2 = 4v_1^2##
Check how you went from the first equation to the second equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and uSee2
TSny said:
Check how you went from the first equation to the second equation.
Ohh!! I can't believe I made that mistake. Thank you so much for catching that. I see now that ##v_2 = \frac 1 2 v_1##