MHB Clearing a Vertical Wall: Solving for Height with Right Angle Trig

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Trig
AI Thread Summary
An airplane ascends from a station at a 10-degree angle to the horizontal. The problem involves determining how high the airplane will be when it reaches a vertical wall that is 100 feet high and 900 feet away. Using the tangent function, the height of the airplane at that distance is calculated to be approximately 58.69 feet. This means the airplane will not clear the wall, as it will be 41.31 feet below the top of the wall. The discussion emphasizes the application of right-angle trigonometry to solve the problem.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
An airplane starts from a station and rises at an angle of 10 deg with the horizontal. By how many feet will it clear a vertical wall 100 ft. High and 900 ft from the station?

I don't get it. Can you provide an image that represent the situation in the problem. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
An airplane starts from a station and rises at an angle of 10 deg with the horizontal. By how many feet will it clear a vertical wall 100 ft. High and 900 ft from the station?

I don't get it. Can you provide an image that represent the situation in the problem. Thanks.

ok ... View attachment 3417
 
Thanks!

My solution

$\tan10^{\circ}=\frac{100'+h}{900'}$h = 58.69 ft.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top