Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (l+1/2)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
Daviddc

Homework Statement


I was going through Sakurai's textbook and I tried to work out by myself the following expression for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (Addition of orbital angular momentum and spin 1/2)

\begin{equation}
\langle m-1/2,1/2|l+1/2,m \rangle = \sqrt{\frac{l+m+1/2}{2l+1}}
\end{equation}

Homework Equations



\begin{equation}
J_{\pm} |jm \rangle=\sqrt{(j \mp m)(j \pm m +1)} \\
J_{i,\pm} |m_1 m_2 \rangle=\sqrt{(j_i \mp m_i)(j_i \pm m_i +1)}
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution



\begin{equation}
|l+1/2,m \rangle = \sum_{m'} \left[|m'-1/2,1/2\rangle \langle m'-1/2,1/2|l+1/2,m \rangle + |m'+1/2,-1/2\rangle \langle m'+1/2,-1/2|l+1/2,m \rangle \right]
\end{equation}

Aplying J_+

\begin{equation}
\sqrt{(l+1/2-m)(l+1/2+m+1)}|l+1/2,m+1 \rangle = \sum_{m'} \left[\sqrt{(l-m'+1/2)(l+m'-1/2+1)}|m'+1/2,1/2\rangle \langle m'-1/2,1/2|l+1/2,m \rangle + \sqrt{(1/2+1/2)(1/2-1/2+1)} |m'+1/2,+1/2\rangle \langle m'+1/2,-1/2|l+1/2,m \rangle +\sqrt{(l-m'-1/2)(l+m'+1/2+1)}(|m'+3/2,-1/2\rangle \langle m'+1/2,-1/2|l+1/2,m \rangle \right]
\end{equation}

Taking the inner product \begin{equation} \langle m+1/2, 1/2 | \end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\sqrt{(l+1/2-m)(l+1/2+m+1)} \langle m+1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m+1 \rangle = \sqrt{ (l-m+1/2)(l+m+1/2)} \langle m-1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m \rangle
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\langle m-1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m \rangle=\sqrt{\frac{l+m+3/2}{l+m+1/2}} \langle m+1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m+1 \rangle
\end{equation}

Aplying the ladder operator until m reaches its maximum value (i.e. l+1/2),

\begin{equation}
\langle m-1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m \rangle=\sqrt{\frac{2l+1}{l+m+1/2}}
\end{equation}

As you can see, I obtain the answer upside down. It is obviously wrong since you get values larger than the unity. In Sakurai's textbook he starts with this:

\begin{equation}
\sqrt{(l+1/2-m)(l+1/2+m+1)} \langle m-1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m \rangle = \sqrt{ (l-m+1/2)(l+m+1/2)} \langle m+1/2,1/2 | l+1/2, m+1 \rangle
\end{equation}

But I don't understand why it is like that instead of the one I derived. I'm sure that my mistake is something stupid, but I can't find it and it is pissing me off since it's 1 am and I didn't have dinner yet because of this. If any of you can point out where I am failing I will be thankful.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I have just realized where my mistake is...

Thank you anyways.