Climbing a Steel Pole in <8 Secs - Ideas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter InducJunc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of designing a mechanism to climb a 10-foot steel pole in under 8 seconds using specific constraints, including a 12vDC battery, two motors, and a weight limit of 15 lbs. Participants explore various methods and ideas for achieving this goal, including mechanical designs and propulsion systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using an electromagnetic propulsion system similar to Maglev trains, but acknowledges a lack of expertise to develop the idea further.
  • Another participant questions the prohibition of springs, seeking clarification on the rules governing the design constraints.
  • Several participants propose using wheels clamped to the pole, with variations on the number of wheels and the need for stabilization to ensure the mechanism runs true.
  • A participant mentions the potential issue of clamping force exceeding the wheels' capability if the rig is heavy or the cable is thin, suggesting a braking system to prevent rollback.
  • Another participant recommends using a rubber track instead of wheels for better grip and suggests optimizing weight by using lightweight materials and gear ratios.
  • Participants discuss the need for the design to allow for an easy descent without free fall, adding complexity to the challenge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of ideas and approaches, with no clear consensus on the best method to achieve the climbing goal. Disagreements exist regarding the use of springs and the specifics of the propulsion system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations based on the design constraints and the need for clarification on the rules governing the competition. There is uncertainty regarding the capabilities of the motors and the overall weight distribution of the climbing mechanism.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in robotics competitions, mechanical design, and engineering challenges may find this discussion relevant.

InducJunc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, with little to none FORMAL physics application experience myself, but quite a bit from the other members in my club. I was wondering what you guys think the fastest methods to climbing a pole would be. Some limitations we have are : one 12vDC battery, only 2 motors (about 150 rpm), and we can't use springs. We have to climb a about 10 foot pole, and we want to do it in less than 8 seconds or as fast as possible. The pole is made of steel. One idea (aside from simpler approaches) that we arrived at (but did not have the expertise to continue with) was to use a electromagnetic propulsion system (similar to Maglev trains?), where we have electromagnets alternating to propel up the pole. We do have a 15 lbs weight limit.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
We have not found the rule which clearly prohibits springs. Can you give me a reference?
 
If you're talking about FRC, it's not in the allowed parts. Though I'd wait until Q's and A's for clarification. (Btw let's not turn this into a FRC thread we got Chief Delphi for that!)
 
FIRST Robotic's team, eh?
I am so pumped for competition though! :] GO ROBOTS!
 
Last edited:
Get off me.
 
Ifin you are into alternatives..I recommend hiring a PRO to do the climbing!
 

Attachments

  • becky_chisnall_31_is_opening_up_a_pole_dancing_stu_1959658669.jpg
    becky_chisnall_31_is_opening_up_a_pole_dancing_stu_1959658669.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 505
Ranger Mike said:
Ifin you are into alternatives..I recommend hiring a PRO to do the climbing!

I do agree, hire a monkey.
 
Can't you just clamp two wheels (each attached to a motor) to opposite sides of the pole and then switch the battery on?

You would need something to stabilise the rig on the pole and keep it running true.

No need for anything complicated.
 
jarednjames said:
Can't you just clamp two wheels (each attached to a motor) to opposite sides of the pole and then switch the battery on?

Almost exactly what I would do, only I'd use 4 wheels, 2 driven. Great minds must think alike.

jarednjames said:
You would need something to stabilise the rig on the pole and keep it running true.

That's what the other 2 wheels are for.

The only drawback is that the clamping force required may exceed what the wheels can cope with if the rig is heavy or the cable is very thin. You could also use a braking system to prevent it from rolling back down.
 
  • #10
this is a zero backlash friction drive used on a machine i sell. note groved drive pulley and tension pulley opposite,
 

Attachments

  • zeroback lash drive.JPG
    zeroback lash drive.JPG
    40.6 KB · Views: 502
  • #11
xxChrisxx said:
The only drawback is that the clamping force required may exceed what the wheels can cope with if the rig is heavy or the cable is very thin. You could also use a braking system to prevent it from rolling back down.

I was actually thinking about that.

Without knowing the details of the motors we don't know what they are capable of.

Given there's a 1kg weight limit, when you consider the battery and the motors alone I wouldn't think they're up to much.
 
  • #12
First one of the mentors says I'm a good stripper, next thing I know we're hiring Maglev's monkey to do a pole dance without any springs and under 15 lbs. I need to show up at the meetings more; I have no idea how things got so weird.
 
  • #13
mag levs don't use motors. the propulsion is built into the track. your only option is attaching wheels to motors and using good old friction as stated above. i would recommend a rubber track instead of wheels, as the rubber track has more surface area for grip. i would also only use one motor to keep the weight down, via a gear transfer case to drive the entire system. pick the lightest motor making the most torque and the lightest battery pack with just enough charge to traverse the length of the pole. Unless you can use the pole itself as a ground and a thin wire as a positive lead.

use as much plastic as you can. the lightest solution will be the fastest one. This is an exercise of weight reduction.

you will have to play with gear ratios in the transfer case to optimise the torque and RPM of your motor.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
This is a race between 4 'bots, the first to the top of the pole wins, there are 4 poles. The pole is steel, 1.75" in diameter and 10' tall.

The design constraints require that we use motor driven wheels to climb. The next problem is that it must come down easily and not in a free fall.
 
  • #15
Integral said:
This is a race between 4 'bots, the first to the top of the pole wins, there are 4 poles. The pole is steel, 1.75" in diameter and 10' tall.

The design constraints require that we use motor driven wheels to climb. The next problem is that it must come down easily and not in a free fall.

I must enquire, where did you get the rules from? Is it possible to get a link so anyone wanting to contribute knows what constraints there are?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K