How Much Torque is Required to Rotate a 1500lb Steel Drum?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on calculating the torque required to rotate a 1500lb steel drum with an 8-foot diameter for the purpose of wrapping air filter material. Participants explore various factors affecting torque, including moment of inertia, angular acceleration, bearing friction, and the potential load from the wrapping mechanism. The conversation includes theoretical calculations and practical considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculated torque using the moment of inertia for a hollow cylinder and expressed concern that the resulting value of 8.81 lb-in seemed low.
  • Another participant questioned the torque value and suggested comparing it to the torque required based on bearing friction.
  • Multiple participants discussed the concept of "bearing efficiency," with one expressing uncertainty about the term and suggesting that a friction factor of 0.50 is unusually high for anti-friction bearings.
  • A participant provided an alternative calculation for torque based on bearing friction, using a friction coefficient for self-aligning ball bearings and estimating a torque value of 25.9 N*mm.
  • Concerns were raised about the slow rotation speed of 0.02 RPM, with one participant suggesting that friction would dominate the torque requirements and that the energy needed to accelerate the drum could be negligible.
  • Participants questioned whether the wrapping mechanism would impose additional load on the drum, potentially affecting the torque needed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the correct torque value or the appropriate methods for calculating it. There are competing views on the significance of bearing friction and the impact of the wrapping mechanism on the required torque.

Contextual Notes

Participants noted potential limitations in the calculations, including assumptions about bearing efficiency and the choice of moment of inertia equations. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the actual load imposed by the wrapping mechanism.

SevenToFive
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
We have a 1500lb steel drum that has a 8 foot diameter that we need to rotate to wrap up air filter material. The drum is supported by bearings on both sides and needs to turn at 0.02rpm.
I calculated the torque, using T=Moment of Inertia * Angular Acceleration. For the moment of inertia I used the equation for a hollow cylinder.
Gravity =386.088in/sec^2
For the weight I figured 2500lbs to factor in losses through friction(0.5). Outside diameter with the roll of air filter material would be 109 inches, inside diameter =100 inches. Final rpm = 0.02, Acceleration time is 5 seconds.

The angular acceleration =0.02*2*3.14/60/5 = 0.00042Rad/sec^2
Moment of inertia = 21041.835lb-in-sec^2
T=I*AA = 21041.835lb-in-sec^2 * 0.00042rad/sec^2
T=8.81lb-in

However that value seems very low to me. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
SevenToFive said:
T=8.81lb-in
... and, in "ft-lbs?" Can you turn it by hand? With a "cheater?"
 
Bystander said:
... and, in "ft-lbs?"
Went the wrong way, sorry. The "by hand" inquiry stands.
 
Calculate the torque required to turn the drum based strictly upon the bearing friction as a comparison for judging if your calculated starting torque is greater than the basic required rotating torque.
 
JBA said:
Calculate the torque required to turn the drum based strictly upon the bearing friction as a comparison for judging if your calculated starting torque is greater than the basic required rotating torque.
I would have 1500lbs, 0.50 for bearing efficiency, and 48" from the center of the drum to the outside, which would give me 36000lb-in, which seems a bit on the high side.
 
I am not sure to what the term "bearing efficiency" refers, since the rolling resistance of an anti-friction bearing is generally based upon the "bearing friction factor" and 0.50 is an extremely high "bearing friction factor" for any type of anti-friction (rolling type) bearing.

See the below website for a typical anti-friction (rolling bearing) resistance torque calculation.

http://www.skf.com/us/products/bear...ction/estimating-frictional-moment/index.html

Also, I believe you used the wrong Moment of Inertia equation for your calculation; and, should have used the "Polar Moment of Inertia" equation for a cylinder rotating about its axis.
 
.02 RPM is VERY VERY slow (once an hour?).. I think in this case the amount of energy needed to accelerate it can pretty much be ignored, you're BIG one is friction which will be orders of magnitude higher.

Looking at this http://www.skf.com/ca/en/products/b...ction/estimating-frictional-moment/index.html and getting some guidelines, the formula is
M = 0,5 μ P d
It seems to me you've mistaken 0.5 as the friction coefficient μ, it is NOT.

From their table, I'm going to choose "Self aligning ball bearings" since most pillow block bearings in industrial applications would fall into that category.. μ for them is 0.0010. You haven't mentioned the shaft size, for that kind of load I'm going to take a stab at guessing a 3" bearing (the d component in the formula)
So that brings me to the following
M = 0.5 * .0010 * (1500 lb * .454kg/lb) * (3in * 25.4 mm/in)
M = 0.5 * .0010 * 681 * 76.2
M = 25.9N*mm (This is far less than I had estimated in my mind)

However, is the wrapping mechanism going to put any load on the drum? that may be the largest force working against you.
 
Rx7man said:
However, is the wrapping mechanism going to put any load on the drum? that may be the largest force working against you.

+1.

What is the tension in the filter material?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K