Clocks On a Hyperdimensional Planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clocks Planet
AI Thread Summary
A clock on a four-dimensional planet, which includes one time dimension, features hands that rotate on two perpendicular planes, allowing for complex time representation. The clock's design indicates daylight or nighttime based on the sun's height, with a unique notation of time as "6p5a," where 'p' and 'a' denote PM and AM respectively. The lengths of the clock hands vary based on the clock's position relative to two defined planes, with one hand being longer due to its proximity to the "blue" plane. The concept of independent rotational periods, as explained by mathematician Clifford in the late 19th century, allows for phenomena such as the sun dipping below the horizon and re-emerging. This complexity in movement reflects the challenges faced by hypothetical four-dimensional beings, whose advanced intelligence is countered by the overwhelming complexity of their existence. The discussion also touches on Earth's rotation and revolution, emphasizing the independent and incommensurate nature of its day and year cycles.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,410
Reaction score
2,782
On a planet with four spatial dimensions and one of time a clock would look like this.

Back Cover -  Clock Face.jpg


The hands are connected with pivots. The height of the jewel corresponds to the height of the Sun in the sky. If it is above white then it is daylight, if above black it is night. Here the sun has height 6. There is no minute hand on this clock, rather there are the blue and red hour hands. The time shown is 6p5a, with a and p corresponding to am and pm.

All this is because 4D objects can rotate on two perpendicular 2D planes. The periods of rotation are independent. This was elucidated by Clifford in about 1895. If the periods are different then the Sun can do things like dip below the horizon then rise again.

The length of the hands depends on the location of the clock on the surface of the planet. This clock is closer to the "blue" plane than it is to the "red" plane so the blue hand is longer.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359213812_Elsewhere_Everyday_Life_On_A_Hypergeometric_Earth.
 
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970
Physics news on Phys.org
It was once believed that beings from the fourth dimension would possess spectacular intelligence. The vastly greater room for neural pathways in their brains would make them as gods to us lowly humans. But in time we came to understand. Every move they make, every simple endeavor, explodes in hopeless complexity. And in time, they would find themselves without the will to even get up in the morn ... noon... early... whatever that clock says.
 
Hornbein said:
All this is because 4D objects can rotate on two perpendicular 2D planes. The periods of rotation are independent. This was elucidated by Clifford in about 1895. If the periods are different then the Sun can do things like dip below the horizon then rise again.
Earth already rotates around two planes that are actually at an acute angle. The periods are independent, incommensurate and important. They are called day and year.
How does the month hand on clocks move? (Note that while hours are equal, months are not.)
 
I think the Earth around the Sun is revolve, not rotate. A 4d planet would do that too, but OP is just talking about rotating. The path the 4d planet would take around the star... I have no idea.
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
Back
Top