Close biological analogs of money?

  • Thread starter Thread starter techmologist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biological Money
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of biological analogs to money, particularly focusing on how biological systems allocate resources and whether certain biological chemicals or processes can be compared to economic principles. Participants examine various aspects of metabolism, signaling, and homeostasis within biological organisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that ATP functions as a common currency of metabolism, likening it to a medium of exchange, but questions its continuous consumption and regeneration.
  • Another participant argues that the analogy of "energy currency" is imperfect, stating that resources in the body are not traded like market forces, but rather cycled through the circulatory system.
  • A different viewpoint proposes that idealistic socialism may be a closer analogy to biological resource allocation than a market-driven economy.
  • One participant expresses interest in self-organizing systems and suggests that price signals might represent a general principle of organization, similar to biological signaling mechanisms.
  • There is a discussion about control mechanisms in biological systems that prevent tissues from being overly greedy in nutrient absorption.
  • References to homeostasis are made, with one participant mentioning diabetes as an example of a failure in glucose homeostasis.
  • Participants share resources and texts related to feedback control theory, expressing a desire to understand the underlying mechanisms of glucose regulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the analogy between biological processes and economic systems, with multiple competing views presented regarding the nature of resource allocation in biological organisms.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the limitations of the analogies being discussed, particularly regarding the differences between biological resource allocation and market dynamics. There is also mention of unresolved complexities in feedback control systems and homeostasis.

techmologist
Messages
313
Reaction score
12
With all a biological organism has to do in the way of allocating limited resources among lots of different parts that need them in a timely manner, I'm wondering if there are biological chemicals that are closely analogous to money.

I've heard ATP referred to as the common currency of metabolism. I can sort of see that. It has the role of an intermediary, which is sort of like a medium of exchange. But doesn't it continuously get consumed and regenerated? That makes me associate it more with a staple food. Like in a primitive economy where agricultural workers are paid in grain so that they can have energy to produce more grain.

Then there are enzymes. Money functions much like a catalyst for exchanges where both sides profit (these are energetically favorable reactions). Without money, these favorable exchanges would take much longer to happen. You have to find someone to barter with. But money lowers the informational barriers to exchange.

The difference is, enzymes don't seem to be possessed by any particular reactant (or is this wrong?), whereas money actually changes hands for exchanges to happen. It is a medium of exchange.

Are there more, or perhaps better, analogies between biological organization and the price system? Or are they more different than similar?

Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Not really no, "energy currency" is an imperfect analogy. Resources in the body aren't traded in any way that is similar to market forces, nutrients are cycled through the circulatory system and absorbed by the tissues that need them. When there aren't enough nutrients reaching tissues they can release signalling factors to encourage release/production from elsewhere.
 
Idealistic socialism would seem to be a closer analogy than a market driven economy.
(Not a political statement, it just seems like a closer analogy to me.)
 
OK, so the market isn't such a great analogy. Still, I can get something even from imperfect analogies. The market might be a specific example of a more general principle of organization. Which I need to find.

Ryan_m_b said:
When there aren't enough nutrients reaching tissues they can release signalling factors to encourage release/production from elsewhere.

That is awesome. I am very interested in self-organizing systems. I guess price signals are just one way of achieving practically the same thing.

I assume there are also control mechanisms to keep any particular tissue from being too greedy, signalling for and absorbing nutrients that could be put to better use elsewhere? Or is it that when the nutrient starts circulating, whatever tissue needs it the most will absorb it the fastest.
 
techmologist said:
I assume there are also control mechanisms to keep any particular tissue from being too greedy, signalling for and absorbing nutrients that could be put to better use elsewhere? Or is it that when the nutrient starts circulating, whatever tissue needs it the most will absorb it the fastest.

You can look up "homeostasis". Diabetes is an example of a disease which can be thought of as a failure of glucose homeostasis.
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/56/6/1489.full

There is also homeostatic control of blood flow.
http://cnx.org/contents/5f4c74cd-b9f4-432c-b12b-24b7f1474a4f@5/Homeostatic-Regulation-of-the-
 
Last edited:
atyy said:
You can look up "homeostasis". Diabetes is an example of a disease which can be thought of as a failure of glucose homeostasis.
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/56/6/1489.full

There is also homeostatic control of blood flow.
http://cnx.org/contents/5f4c74cd-b9f4-432c-b12b-24b7f1474a4f@5/Homeostatic-Regulation-of-the-

Thank you! I have been trying to psych myself up to learn the nuts and bolts of feedback control theory, and that model for glucose regulation is exactly the type of motivation I need to get into it. It also served as a useful reminder to put the books down once in a while and get some exercise so the muscles don't forget how to dispose of glucose. And to keep the beer belly in check. Perhaps a switch to Bud Light is indicated. :)

I like Bergman's understanding of how science works. New understanding is always schematic in nature. You can always fill in details later as needed, but to gain new knowledge, you have to have a simplified model that cuts to the chase.
 
techmologist said:
Thank you! I have been trying to psych myself up to learn the nuts and bolts of feedback control theory, and that model for glucose regulation is exactly the type of motivation I need to get into it. It also served as a useful reminder to put the books down once in a while and get some exercise so the muscles don't forget how to dispose of glucose. And to keep the beer belly in check. Perhaps a switch to Bud Light is indicated. :)

I like Bergman's understanding of how science works. New understanding is always schematic in nature. You can always fill in details later as needed, but to gain new knowledge, you have to have a simplified model that cuts to the chase.

Actually, I meant to put something simpler than Bergman's article, but unknowingly did something that switched the links!

Anyway, knock yourself out if you'd like to learn feedback control on the glucose regulation system! I'd love to understand it one day too. You may find Astrom and Murray's text http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/Main_Page useful. There's a very brief discussion of the work by Bergman and others in section 3.6 of the first edition or Appendix A.6 of the draft second edition http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/books/AM08/pdf/fbs-examples_22Jun14.pdf.
 
atyy said:
Actually, I meant to put something simpler than Bergman's article, but unknowingly did something that switched the links!

It worked out for the best. I was able to piece together what truncal adiposity meant from the context. You can bet I will try to work that into a conversation.

Anyway, knock yourself out if you'd like to learn feedback control on the glucose regulation system! I'd love to understand it one day too. You may find Astrom and Murray's text http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/Main_Page useful. There's a very brief discussion of the work by Bergman and others in section 3.6 of the first edition or Appendix A.6 of the draft second edition http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/books/AM08/pdf/fbs-examples_22Jun14.pdf.

Excellent. Thanks!

Of course I'll have to start out easy, with bimetallic strip thermostats and all that. But ultimately I want to understand those feedback control systems whose design coincided with their implementation. Nature just makes stuff up as it goes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K