Closed sets in a topological space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In a topological space (X, τ), the assertion that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B, where A ⊆ B, is false if A is not closed in B. The discussion highlights that while A is closed in itself, it does not guarantee closure in B unless A is explicitly stated to be closed. The concept of compactness does not rectify this issue, as compact sets are not necessarily closed, as illustrated by the Zariski topology on R. The example of the interval (0,1) demonstrates that compact sets can exist without being closed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with closed and open sets in topology
  • Knowledge of compactness in the context of topology
  • Awareness of the Zariski topology and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of closed and open sets in various topological spaces
  • Explore the implications of compactness in different topological contexts
  • Research the Zariski topology and its characteristics on R
  • Learn about neighborhood systems and their role in topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the properties of closed and open sets within topological spaces.

logarithmic
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
If A\subseteq B are both subsets of a topological space (X,\tau), is it true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
logarithmic said:
If A\subseteq B are both subsets of a topological space (X,\tau), is it true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B?

Note that A is a closed subset of A...
 
Hurkyl said:
Note that A is a closed subset of A...
Hmm, I'm not sure. I never said A was closed. A is in B which is in X. And some other set in A, maybe call it U, is closed. I think the answer would be U is closed in X but I don't quite see why.
 
Hurkyl's point is that any topological space is both open and closed as a subset of itself. If A is NOT closed as a subset of topological space B, since it IS closed as a subset of itself, the statement "any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B" is false.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Hurkyl's point is that any topological space is both open and closed as a subset of itself. If A is NOT closed as a subset of topological space B, since it IS closed as a subset of itself, the statement "any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B" is false.
Ahh i see. Thanks. But is that the only problem here? If we insist that A is compact in B, then that fixes the problem and the statement is true, right?
 
Um, just insisting that A is closed is all you need, nothing to do with compactness. In fact compactness won't help you at all - compact does not imply closed (e.g. the Zariski topology on R).
 
?? I thought compact did imply closed!

Oh, I see. I started to give the proof and then realized I was saying "given points p and q construct neighborhoods about p and q that do not intersect". That's not possible in some topological spaces.
 
If you don't know what the Zariski topology is (and Halls does but forget, temporarily) consider the topology on R given by:

U is open if and only if U contains the interval (0,1) - the set (0,1) is in this and is certainly compact, but not closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K