logarithmic
- 103
- 0
If A\subseteq B are both subsets of a topological space (X,\tau), is it true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B?
In a topological space (X, τ), the assertion that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B, where A ⊆ B, is false if A is not closed in B. The discussion highlights that while A is closed in itself, it does not guarantee closure in B unless A is explicitly stated to be closed. The concept of compactness does not rectify this issue, as compact sets are not necessarily closed, as illustrated by the Zariski topology on R. The example of the interval (0,1) demonstrates that compact sets can exist without being closed.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the properties of closed and open sets within topological spaces.
logarithmic said:If A\subseteq B are both subsets of a topological space (X,\tau), is it true that any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B?
Hmm, I'm not sure. I never said A was closed. A is in B which is in X. And some other set in A, maybe call it U, is closed. I think the answer would be U is closed in X but I don't quite see why.Hurkyl said:Note that A is a closed subset of A...
Ahh i see. Thanks. But is that the only problem here? If we insist that A is compact in B, then that fixes the problem and the statement is true, right?HallsofIvy said:Hurkyl's point is that any topological space is both open and closed as a subset of itself. If A is NOT closed as a subset of topological space B, since it IS closed as a subset of itself, the statement "any closed subset of A is also a closed subset of B" is false.