CNC: Deviations from the nominal thread profile due to tilting angle of the cutting insert?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FranzS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cutting
Click For Summary
Tilting the cutting insert during CNC threading can slightly widen the flank angle of the resulting thread, but this change is generally within acceptable tolerances. The nominal cross-section profile of a thread is typically considered along the lathe's z-axis, rather than perpendicular to the thread helix. When cutting threads, only the rounded tip and one side of the tool profile engage, facilitating easier waste removal. For small diameter shanks with coarse pitch threads, tilting the tool can enhance the relief angle on the cutting side, improving performance. Proper tool positioning and technique are essential for achieving the desired thread quality.
FranzS
Messages
86
Reaction score
26
TL;DR
Deviations from the nominal thread profile due to tilting angle of the cutting insert?
Hello CNC experts!
For threads with a high "pitch to diameter ratio", so to speak, the manufacturers of cutting inserts for CNC threading suggest tilting the insert at an angle ##\lambda## with respect to the ##z## axis (spindle axis on a lathe), so that the cutting edge/surface of the insert will work perpendicular to the groove it's "digging" (though that is true only at a very specific diameter [##x## coordinate on a lathe], but let's not get into such tiny details).
See for example what the manufacturer Sandvik Coromant writes (link: https://www.sandvik.coromant.com/en.../how-to-choose-thread-turning-insert-and-shim):

IMG_20241202_215011.jpg



My question #1 is: wouldn't such a tilting "widen" the profile of the resulting thread (i.e. increase the flank angle with respect to its nominal value) when the cross-section of the thread along the ##z## axis (not considering angle ##\lambda##) is inspected?
I guess the "widening" of the flank angle due to the tilting is so small that it is still within the tolerances indicated by the standards?

And here's my question #2, closely related to the previous one: is the nominal cross-section profile of a thread (ISO, etc.) to be considered along the "threaded stem" axis (i.e. the lathe's ##z## axis) or perpendicular to the thread helix (thus taking into account the ##\lambda## angle)?
I've always thought the former was the correct cross-section to be considered.

Thanks for your attention.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
FranzS said:
I guess the "widening" of the flank angle due to the tilting is so small that it is still within the tolerances indicated by the standards?
That is correct.
If the shank diameter is so small, that a tilt must be present, then the thread pitch is too coarse. The angle of the thread as a helix will then be too steep, and the nut will tend to come undone.

When cutting the thread, only the rounded tip and one side of the profile tool is cutting. The helical waste is then easier to curl, and can exit from the tool as a strip or helix without tangling. Between passes, the tool is advanced diagonally, parallel with one flank as the thread becomes deeper. By hand, that advance is usually done on the compound slide.

Normally, for reducing shank diameter, or cutting right-hand threads, you cut with the left flank of the tool, which for threads, has the lower relief angle, less chatter, and better finish. Meanwhile, you follow the flank on the right of the tool, where there is higher relief, but without cutting, so not damaging that less supported, so more vulnerable, right-hand edge of the tool.

Coarse pith threads on small diameter shanks, are the occasion that may require a tilt of the tool to increase the presented relief angle on the left-hand side of the insert.
 
Baluncore said:
That is correct.
If the shank diameter is so small, that a tilt must be present, then the thread pitch is too coarse. The angle of the thread as a helix will then be too steep, and the nut will tend to come undone.

When cutting the thread, only the rounded tip and one side of the profile tool is cutting. The helical waste is then easier to curl, and can exit from the tool as a strip or helix without tangling. Between passes, the tool is advanced diagonally, parallel with one flank as the thread becomes deeper. By hand, that advance is usually done on the compound slide.

Normally, for reducing shank diameter, or cutting right-hand threads, you cut with the left flank of the tool, which for threads, has the lower relief angle, less chatter, and better finish. Meanwhile, you follow the flank on the right of the tool, where there is higher relief, but without cutting, so not damaging that less supported, so more vulnerable, right-hand edge of the tool.

Coarse pith threads on small diameter shanks, are the occasion that may require a tilt of the tool to increase the presented relief angle on the left-hand side of the insert.
Great, thanks a lot
 
Assume that a 100m long (probably irrelevant) train travelling at 30m/s, with a mass of 100.000 Kg passes next to a man/woman of 100 Kg standing still at 1 m away from the track. Since air is massively displaced by the train, creating like a small vacuum/low pressure area next to its surface, I reckon a certain pull may be applied to anything the train passes by, so in this case a person. My question is very simple: this pull can be quantified by a force. Is this force enough to pull the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K