Co-Ordinate Geometry - Find P for |PA - PB| is maximum

  • Thread starter Thread starter AGNuke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Maximum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the coordinates of a point P on the line defined by the equation 2x - y + 5 = 0, such that the absolute difference in distances from P to points A (4, -2) and B (2, -4) is maximized. The subject area is coordinate geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometric interpretation of the problem, including the use of sketches to visualize the relationship between points A, B, and P. Some express uncertainty about the requirements of the question and seek guidance on how to approach it conceptually.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions under which the absolute difference |PA - PB| is maximized. Some participants suggest that point P should lie on the line through A and B, while others are considering the implications of this condition. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of sketches and the relationship between the points.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as time limitations during exams and the desire for a subjective approach rather than purely objective methods. There is also a discussion about the assumptions made regarding the distances PA and PB.

AGNuke
Gold Member
Messages
455
Reaction score
9
The co-ordinates of a point P on the line 2x - y + 5 = 0 such that |PA - PB| is maximum, where A is (4,-2) and B is (2, -4) will be:

A) (11, 27)
B) (-11, -17) (Answer)
C) (-11, 17) (Eliminated since it does not lie on the given line)
D) (0, 5)

Honest speaking, I don't know what to do in this question. I just attempted to prove that mirror image of A, P and B are non-collinear, but it doesn't changed the fact that I still can't reach to the answer.

Basically, I just want to ask that what is the demand of the question? What I must try to prove? Sorry for being so much of a newbie, but I can't get over with it.

I only ask for the direction in which I should work. I will try to do the rest.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AGNuke! :smile:

Easiest is if you make a drawing of your line and your points A and B.
Now imagine picking a point P on the line and consider the difference in distances to A and B.
When you have drawn this, it should become apparent when this difference in distances is at a maximum...
 
and how can I derive the co-ordinates.

In the exams, we have less than 3 minutes to attempt the question and jot down the answer in the OMR sheet. That summation question I previously asked also falls in the category, despite of the fact that no one was able to solve it SUBJECTIVELY, it was done by objective approach.

You are asking me to do the same. But it would be best if I can solve it via co-ordinate geometry.
 
Well, in 3 minutes you can quickly make a drawing.
Hopefully you'll say "aaah, that's what they intended" and then you can immediately see what the right answer is.

In this case point P is the intersection of the specified line and the line through points A and B.
 
A rough sketch of the problem, I can draw it. But that's only for visualization. It is not accurate so I can't tell where my answer lies exactly.

I am just looking for a proper subjective approach.
 
First you need to realize that a point P for which |PA - PB| is at its maximum must lie on the line through A and B.

Then set up an equation for the line through A and B.

Solve the system of 2 equations and you have your answer.
 
Voila! That's quite right solution you got there. Just wondering how why this condition was necessary.

My take is for a ΔPAB, AB + PB ≥ PA
= AB ≥ PA - PB (Assuming both sides to be positive i.e. PA > PB)

Thus, maximum value of PA - PB is AB, only when the triangle is a line.

Is my explanation is right?
 
AGNuke said:
Voila! That's quite right solution you got there. Just wondering how why this condition was necessary.

My take is for a ΔPAB, AB + PB ≥ PA
= AB ≥ PA - PB (Assuming both sides to be positive i.e. PA > PB)

Thus, maximum value of PA - PB is AB, only when the triangle is a line.

Is my explanation is right?

Yes!
Your explanation is right.
(Although incomplete, since you've assumed PA > PB...)
 
Ok, I'll replace it with AB ≥ |PA - PB|
 
  • #10
That will do it!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K