Coherent Photons: Uncertainty and Locality

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marrrrrrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherent Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of coherence in lasers and the implications for the localization of photons. Participants explore the relationship between coherence, quantum states, and the uncertainty principle, questioning how two photons can be considered to occupy the same position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that coherence in lasers implies that photons can be considered to be at the same location, while others argue that this is not accurate due to the uncertainty principle.
  • One participant suggests two interpretations of photon localization: being "roughly" at the same spot or literally at the exact same spot, though not precisely defined.
  • Another participant asserts that coherence refers to many photons being in the same quantum state, rather than being at the same position.
  • A later reply clarifies that there is only one quantum state for the many-photon system and that this state does not provide a well-defined position for photons.
  • It is noted that there is no well-defined position operator for photons, complicating the discussion of their localization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of coherence for photon localization, with no consensus reached on how to interpret the relationship between quantum states and position.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of a well-defined position operator for massless particles like photons and the complexities surrounding the interpretation of quantum states in relation to localization.

Marrrrrrr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I understand that laser is based on the phenomenon of coherence. But I wonder how, say, two photons could be said to be located at the exact same spot when their locations could not be precisely defined due to the principle of uncertainty.

To specify, which between the following two would be closer to the truth?

(1) They are "roughly" located at the same spot, which is enough for practical purposes.

(2) They are quite literally at the exact same spot, although it is not well-defined precisely at which spot they are colocated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marrrrrrr said:
I wonder how, say, two photons could be said to be located at the exact same spot

They can't. But that's not what "coherence" means. It means, heuristically, that you have many photons in the same quantum state, not many photons at the same position.
 
PeterDonis said:
They can't. But that's not what "coherence" means. It means, heuristically, that you have many photons in the same quantum state, not many photons at the same position.
Okay, thanks. But isn't it that one of those quantum states they share is about their positions?
 
Marrrrrrr said:
isn't it that one of those quantum states they share is about their positions?

There is only one quantum state involved. Strictly speaking, it's not a state that is "shared" by all the photons: it's a single quantum state of the many-photon system. (Really strictly speaking, this state does not even have a definite photon number, but that's probably going deeper than we need to here.)

As for position, there is no well-defined position operator for photons (or for any massless particles), so no, the quantum state in question is not about positions in any useful sense.
 
Marrrrrrr said:
I understand that laser is based on the phenomenon of coherence. But I wonder how, say, two photons could be said to be located at the exact same spot when their locations could not be precisely defined due to the principle of uncertainty. ...

:welcome:

Presumably you know that the photons in a laser are said to be in phase, and will have the same polarization.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K