Cohomology of Z^+ and Infinite Dimensional de Rham Cohomology

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kakarotyjn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the infinite dimensionality of the de Rham Cohomology spaces H^0(M) and H^0(F), where M and F represent the set of positive integers Z^+. It establishes that H^0(M) ⊗ H^0(F) consists of finite sums of rank 1 matrices (a_{ij}), despite the infinite dimensionality of the bases involved. The bases {e_i} for H^0(M) and {f_j} for H^0(F) are shown to allow for finite linear combinations, leading to the conclusion that elements of H^0(M) ⊗ H^0(F) can be expressed as sums of the form ∑ a_{ij} e_i ⊗ f_j.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of de Rham Cohomology
  • Familiarity with tensor products in vector spaces
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly bases and linear combinations
  • Comprehension of infinite dimensional vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of infinite dimensional vector spaces
  • Learn about the construction and applications of tensor products
  • Explore the isomorphism V ⊗ V* = End V in finite-dimensional contexts
  • Investigate the implications of bases in infinite dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology, differential geometry, and anyone studying the properties of infinite dimensional vector spaces and their cohomological aspects.

kakarotyjn
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Let M and F each be the set Z^+ of all positive integers.So the de Rham Cohomolgoy H^0(M) and H^0(F) is infinite dimensional.

But why does H^0(M)\otimes H^0(F) consist of finite sums of matrices (a_{ij}) of rank 1?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be a bit careful when you write (a_{ij}). Presumably here the indices i and j are allowed to run over an (uncountably) infinite set, because otherwise what you're saying doesn't make much sense (to me).

To see what's going on, let \{e_i\}_{i \in I} and \{f_j\}_{j\in J} be bases for H^0(M) and H^0(F). (Note that |I|=|J|=|\mathbb R|. This is because H^0(M) = H^0(F) = \prod_{i \in \mathbb Z^+} \mathbb R = \mathbb R^{\mathbb Z^+}, which has dimension |\mathbb R|^{|\mathbb Z^+|} = |\mathbb R|.) Then \{e_i \otimes f_j\} is a basis for H^0(M) \otimes H^0(F), and therefore an element of this latter space is a finite linear combination \sum a_{ij} \, e_i \otimes f_j. We can think of e_i \otimes f_j as being a rank 1 |I|x|J| matrix with an entry of 1 in the (i,j)th position and zeros elsewhere.

Does this help? Note that this kind of construction ought to be reminiscent of the isomorphism V \otimes V^\ast = \text{End}V (for finite-dimensional V), where if you fix a basis {e_i} for V with corresponding dual basis {e_i*} then the element e_i \otimes e_j^* is literally the rank 1 matrix with 1 in the (i,j)th position and zeros elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Hi morphism! I'm still not clear why it is a finite linear combination \sum a_{ij} \, e_i \otimes f_j,since the bases \{ e_i \} and \{ f_i \} are infinite dimensional,so \{ e_i \otimes f_i \} should be infinite dimensional,isn't it?

Thank you!
 
The definition of a basis says you only take finite linear combinations, even if the basis itself is infinite.
 
Oh,I see.Every element is a finite linear combination of bases,so H^0(M)\otimes H^0(F)<br /> consist of finite sum of matrices.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K