Coleman's Instanton and Level Splitting in Double Well

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lingf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Coleman's treatment of instantons and level splitting in a double well potential as presented in his book "Aspects of Symmetry." Specifically, it highlights the absence of an explicit expression for the coefficient K in equation (2.41) on page 276. Participants express interest in calculating the determinant involved in this context, noting that while it is challenging to compute in full quantum field theory (QFT), estimations are often sufficient. The initial work on this determinant was conducted by 't Hooft in a seminal paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with instantons and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of determinants in mathematical physics
  • Ability to interpret equations from advanced theoretical texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry" for detailed insights on instantons
  • Research 't Hooft's original paper on determinants in QFT
  • Explore methods for estimating determinants in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about level splitting in quantum systems and its implications
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers focused on quantum field theory and instanton calculations.

lingf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i am now reading the book by coleman, aspects of symmetry.

i am a bit interested in the instanton.

in his book, he discussed how to calculate the level splitting in a double well potential.

as for this splitting, it seems that he did not give an explicit expression of the coefficient K,

see his equation (2.41) on page 276.

how to calculate the fraction involving det?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i believe he does it in the appendix of those notes. but when generalizing to the full QFT, calculating that determinant is VERY difficult, and is almost never done in practice (it is usually enough that we can estimate its size without actually working out the exact value). it was done first (to my knowledge) by 't Hooft in a famous, and very dense, paper.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K