Collapsing Stars: White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars & Singularity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SpitfireAce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the properties of white dwarfs, neutron stars, and singularities, emphasizing the conflict between quantum mechanics and general relativity. It establishes that electron and neutron degeneracy arise from the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that fermions cannot occupy the same quantum state. The conversation highlights that singularities violate the uncertainty principle, as they represent a point of infinite density and energy, which is incompatible with quantum mechanics. The need for a unified theory to reconcile these discrepancies is also noted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the Pauli exclusion principle
  • Familiarity with general relativity and its predictions regarding singularities
  • Knowledge of electron and neutron degeneracy concepts
  • Basic grasp of quantum states, including energy levels and spin
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle in quantum mechanics
  • Study the differences between quantum mechanics and general relativity
  • Explore the concept of singularities and their role in theoretical physics
  • Investigate current theories aiming to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the complexities of stellar evolution and the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and relativity.

SpitfireAce
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
White dwarfs and neutron stars have very low uncertainty in position (since the particles are practically on top of each other), but a lot of uncertainty in momentum, and thus the claustrophobic particles vibrate with great momentum creating an outward force to oppose gravity, but doesn't a singularity defy the uncertainty principle? All the stuff that used to be the star collapses to have a common position/time (a point of infinite density) and momentum/energy (all the mass-energy is infinitely compacted to that point)...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Your understanding of electron and neutron degeneracy is incorrect. These forms of degeneracy have nothing to do with small uncertainties in position. After all, even a tiny neutron star is still enormous compared to subatomic scales.

Electron and neutron degeneracy are the result of all quantum mechanical states being filled. Since both electrons and neutrons are fermions, only one particle can occupy a particular quantum state.

Singularities absolutely do violate the uncertainty principle, In fact, singularities are not permitted in quantum mechanics at all. Quantum mechanics forbids singularities, while general relativity predicts them -- this is one of the reasons why these two theories are incompatible, and one of the reasons physicists are seeking a more general theory that will correctly unify them.

- Warren
 
"only one particle can occupy a particular quantum state."
This sounds like the Pauli-exclusion principle, but I thought the underpinning behind the principle was uncertainty, if the electrons fell into the same state in the atom they would be defying uncertainty, my wave interpretation is that the energy levels are the different harmonics of standing probability waves possible, and the reason there is nothing in between is that if two probability waves overlapped it would mean there was a probability of two electrons with common position and energy/momentum, is this all correct?

I'm reading Feynman's lectures on physics and he tends to talk about electrons like little tennis balls bouncing around

I'm assuming by quantum states you mean energy level, sub level, orbital, spin ect.

thanks for replying =)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K