Collision Question problem with question itself

  • Thread starter Thread starter GregA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
GregA
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
This is a problem that though I've solved has had me racking my brains trying to figure out whether or whether not I actually understand what I'm doing..here goes:

Particles A and B have mass m and are moving in the same direction along a line, A with speed 3u and B with speed u. They collide and after the impact they both move in the same direction, A with speed u and B with speed ku. The coefficient of restitution is e

a) show that e = (k-1)/2
b) Deduce that 1 =< k =< 3
c) Find the loss in kinetic energy in terms of m, k, and u.

As I said above...reaching the answers to these questions is not the problem...the bit that's bothering me is that before getting to the bit where I could solve part a) I had come to the conclusion that k can only = 3. My reasoning is as follows:

The total momentum of the system before impact is 3mu + mu, and given that I know the momentum of A after impact (mu) I can say that:
mu + kmu = 4mu...k = 3...the other way I look at it is as follows:

B imparts an impulse on A that changes it's velocity from being 3mu to mu, in doing this A must impart the same impulse to B such that:
-(mu - 3mu) = (kmu - mu)...k still = 3 (the minus sign is because J acts in different directions)

The question implies however that e and k are not already determined and can take any value beween 0,1... 1,3 respectively.
The only conclusion that I can reach however is that this is wrong and that given the mass of both objects, their initial speeds and either the value of e or just the speed of either A or B any other values are forced...this question stated otherwise :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your thinking seems correct to me. The problem--as stated--makes no sense. Since you are given the final velocity of one of the masses, all else is determined.
 
ah cheers for backing me up Doc Al...I've spent too long torturing myself over this one :smile: (The question I have stated is quoted word for word from the book (forgot the period at the end of the paragraph though :smile: ))