B Combinations of 6 taken 4 at a time

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vector1962
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinations Time
Vector1962
Messages
61
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
the calculation 6C4 shows 15 but what if all sets are to be distinct?
the calculation 6C4 shows 15 but what if all sets are to be distinct? meaning 1,2,3,4 is the same as 4,3,2,1. I made a tree diagram and i get 10... assuming i did that correctly...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vector1962 said:
Summary:: the calculation 6C4 shows 15 but what if all sets are to be distinct?

the calculation 6C4 shows 15 but what if all sets are to be distinct? meaning 1,2,3,4 is the same as 4,3,2,1. I made a tree diagram and i get 10... assuming i did that correctly...?
There are definitely 15 distinct combinations. It's easier to count all the ways of leaving two numbers out.
 
6C4 is the number of combinations, meaning that order does not matter. 6P4 is the number of permutations, meaning that order does matter.
6C4 = 6!/(4!*2!) = 30/2=15.
6P4 = 6!/2! = 720/2 = 360.
The extra 4! in the denominator of 6C4 divides by the number of ways that the 4 selected can be ordered, so the result is the number of possibilities ignoring their order.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Klystron and Delta2
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top