Common Eigenstates: Definition & Meaning

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstates
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of common eigenstates in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to commuting operators. Participants explore the implications of this concept for eigenstates of the Hamiltonian and other operators, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of finding eigenstates in quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of "choosing common eigenstates" when two operators commute, suggesting a need for clarification on whether this implies differing eigenstates or a shared set.
  • Another participant clarifies that commuting operators allow for the selection of a countable basis of common eigenvectors, but does not imply that all eigenvectors of one operator are also eigenvectors of the other.
  • A third participant provides an example using angular momentum operators, noting that while common eigenfunctions exist, one can also construct wave functions that are eigenfunctions of one operator but not the other.
  • There is a discussion about the typical approach in quantum mechanics of finding eigenstates of the Hamiltonian and whether this means all eigenstates are common eigenstates with another operator.
  • One participant emphasizes that if there are degenerate eigenstates, it is possible to create new eigenfunctions that are common to both the Hamiltonian and another operator, while non-degenerate eigenstates are inherently common to both if the operators commute.
  • Another participant requests an example involving the kinetic energy operator and the Hamiltonian for free electrons, seeking confirmation of their relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of commuting operators and the nature of eigenstates. While some agree on the ability to find common eigenstates, there is no consensus on the interpretation of these states in relation to the Hamiltonian and other operators.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of eigenstate relationships in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding degeneracy and the implications of operator commutation. Specific assumptions about the nature of operators and their eigenstates are not fully resolved.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
If two operators commute my book says that "we can choose common eigenstates of the two." And I have seen it phrased like this in multiple other books.
Does this mean that in general the eigenstates differ, but we can choose a set that is the same or what does it exactly mean in comparison to just saying that they have common eigenstates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no statement that if A and B (strongly) commute, then all eigenvectors of A are also eigenvectors of B and reverse. The statement is that if A and B are commuting compact operators, then you can choose a countable basis of the Hilbert space they act on from their common eigenvectors.
 
Take the angular momentum operators ##l^2## and ##l_z##. The spherical harmonics ##Y_{l,m}## are eigenfunctions of both operators. But I can construct wave functions, such as
$$
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( Y_{1,1} + Y_{1,-1} \right),
$$
which are eigenfunctions of ##l^2## but not ##l_z##, and conversely.

So, if two operators commute, you can always find a complete basis set of states which are simultaneously eigenstates of both operators. But often, if you consider only one operator at a time, the eigenfunctions you calculate will not be eigenfunctions of the other operator.
 
Okay. But the generic quantum problem is always. Find the eigenstates and eigenenergies of the hamiltonian and often this is solved by finding common eigenfunctions of H and an operator. But with what you are saying this is not all the eigenstates of the hamiltonian?
 
aaaa202 said:
But with what you are saying this is not all the eigenstates of the hamiltonian?
No, that's not what I mean. Given a complete set of basis functions, if some eigenstates have degenerate (i.e., have the same eigenvalue), then you can always create a new complete set of basis functions by taking linear combinations of thoses degenerate eigenstates. If the Hamiltonian commutes with another operator, then there necessarily exist at least one way to make those linear combinations of degenerate eigenstates such that the resulting are eigenfunctions of both the Hamiltonian and the other operator.

If there is no degeneracy, then the eigenstates are necessarily eigenfunctions of both commuting operators.
 
Can you give an example? Maybe the kinetic energy operator and the hamiltonian for free electrons is an example, am I right?
 
I just gave an example above.
 
aaaa202 said:
Can you give an example? Maybe the kinetic energy operator and the hamiltonian for free electrons is an example, am I right?

For a free particle, they are the same, right ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K