Graduate Commutation between spin-operator and creation operator(QFT)

  • Thread starter Thread starter retardedgreensfunc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutation Creation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the commutation relation between the spin operator and the creation operator for a transverse polarized photon in quantum field theory. Participants explore the application of Noether's theorem and the definition of the z-component of the spin operator, ##\hat{S}_z##. One user initially struggles with the derivation but realizes that using the mode expansion simplifies the process significantly. They conclude that the helicity operator, which corresponds to the polarization states of the photon, is key to understanding the commutation relations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of the correct definitions and relationships in quantum field theory for successful derivation.
retardedgreensfunc
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Want to find the commutation relation between the z-component spin-operator and creation operator for a transverse polarized photon.
Hi, so I'm currently reading the book "QFT for the gifted amateur", and doing the exercises. In exercise 14.2, which in itself is fine, the authors say that you can show using Noether's theorem that for a transverse polarized photon of momentum q, the z-component of the spin operator obeys the commutation relation:
1585393149065.png

Here, the epsilon is the polariztion vectors, and we assume the photon is traveling in the z-direction.
I really want to be able to derive this for myself, but I have tried for a while now, but without success. Anyone have any tips on how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is ##\hat{S}_z## defined in the book, I don't have at hand right now?
 
vanhees71 said:
How is ##\hat{S}_z## defined in the book, I don't have at hand right now?
I know the mode expansion can be written:
1585393961960.png
 
Turns out I was overthinking it, and once I had the mode expansion it was very easy to just take the commutator by using the defining commutation relations for the creation and anihilation operators.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
For a photon with ##\vec{p}## in ##z## direction that's the helicity operator (i.e., the projection of the total angular momentum to the direction of the photon momentum). That's the correct polarization quantity for a massless photon. A photon has only two helicity states with eigenvalues ##\pm 1##.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K