Commutation relation to find Sx, Sy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter M. next
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutation Relation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the spin operators Sx, Sy, and Sz and their commutation relations. Participants explore whether it is possible to derive Sx and Sy from the known commutation relations involving these operators, specifically focusing on the implications of choosing different representations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that Sx and Sy can be derived from S+ and S-, and that the commutation relations [Sx, Sy] = iħSz, [Sy, Sz] = iħSx, and [Sz, Sx] = iħSy can be proven after finding Sx and Sy.
  • Another participant argues that Sx, Sy, and Sz are not uniquely defined by their commutation relations, emphasizing that a choice of representation is necessary, as swapping the operators still satisfies the original relations.
  • A participant suggests that if a specific representation is chosen, one can algebraically solve the Lie algebra to find the explicit forms of the spin operators.
  • Further clarification is sought by another participant regarding the method of working with representations and commutation relations.
  • It is noted that knowing Sz in one representation allows for the determination of Sx and Sy, either through the commutation relations or by using the ladder operators S+ and S-.
  • Another participant expands on the idea by discussing the angular momentum generators Ji, stating that the commutation relations can be used to find all angular momentum representations, including those for spin operators.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Sx and Sy can be derived from the commutation relations alone. While some suggest that it is possible under specific conditions, others emphasize the necessity of choosing a representation, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on representation choices and the implications this has on the definitions of the spin operators. There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific methods for deriving the operators from the commutation relations.

M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
We know how to find S_{x} and S_{y} if we used S_{+} and S_{-}, and after finding S_{x} and S_{y}, we can prove that

[S_{x}, S_{y}]= i\hbarS_{z} (Equation 1)
and
[S_{y}, S_{z}]= i\hbarS_{x} (Equation 2)
and
[S_{z}, S_{x}]= i\hbarS_{y} (Equation 3)

but can we, starting from Equations 1, 2, and 3 find Sx and Sy? Can we work in the opposite direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No Sx, Sy, and Sz are not uniquely defined by their commutation relations. At some point a choice of representation must be made. To make that point obvious, just replace Sx with Sy, Sy with Sz, and Sz with Sx. Now they are all different than before since they've been replaced by each other, but they still satisfy the original commutation relations. The standard Pauli matrices is just one among many equally valid possible representations.
 
M. next said:
Can we work in the opposite direction?

If you choose a specific representation then yes, finding the explicit form of the spin operators in the chosen representation amounts to algebraically solving the Lie algebra.
 
Thank you for the answers. WannabeNewton, could you explain what you meant with more details? How should I be working if that's the case?
 
I think WannabeNewton said that by choosing a specific representation for S_{x,y,z} you can just calculate their commutator relations (~algebra) and reproduce equations 1,2,3.
 
Yes, but my question was if I could find either Sx, Sy, or Sz by commutation relation. More clearly, I meant can we starting from equations 1, 2, 3 and knowing Sz find Sx? Sy?
 
Again the actual method of determining the representations of ##S_i## depends on the representation itself. But we can do even better than what you asked for directly above.

Consider more generally the angular momentum generators ##J_i## which includes both spin and orbital angular momentum. We can use ##[J_i,J_j] = i\epsilon_{ijk}J_k## (and only this) to find all angular momentum representations of the ##J_i## i.e. we get the complete set of simultaneous eigenstates ##|j,m\rangle ## of ##J^2## and ##J_z## using only the above commutator relations and the method of raising and lower operators and then for each fixed ##j = 0,\frac{1}{2},1,...## we get an angular momentum representation of ##J_i## by calculating ##\langle j',m' |J_i |j,m \rangle## where ##m = -j,...,j##. For the ##j = \frac{1}{2}## representation of the ##S_i## this gives us back the Pauli (spin) matrices. We can thus find all possible angular momentum matrix representations of the ##J_i## using only ##[J_i,J_j] = i\epsilon_{ijk}J_k## through the solving of a simultaneous eigenvalue problem for the compatible observables.
 
Knowing Sz in one representation, you can find Sx,Sy in that too...either from eqs 1,2,3 or by finding the ladder operators S+ S-
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K