Commutator relations for the Ehrenfest Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the derivation of commutator relations for the Hamiltonian operator in the context of the Ehrenfest theorem. Key equations discussed include the momentum operator \( p_{op} = -i \hbar \nabla \) and the Hamiltonian \( H = \frac{p_{op}^2}{2m} + V(r,t) \). The commutator relations derived are \([H,p_{op}] = i \hbar \nabla V(r,t)\) and \([H,r] = -\frac{\hbar^2}{m} \nabla\). The discussion emphasizes the application of the product rule in operator calculus to clarify the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the Ehrenfest theorem.
  • Familiarity with operator algebra in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of commutator relations and their physical significance.
  • Basic calculus, particularly the product rule and differentiation of functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Ehrenfest theorem and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about operator algebra and commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the application of the product rule in operator calculus.
  • Investigate the role of the Laplacian operator in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on operator theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of the Ehrenfest theorem.

tommy01
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi there,...

For a derivation of the Ehrenfestequations i found the following commutator relations for the Hamilton-Operator in a book:
H = \frac{p_{op}^2}{2m} + V(r,t)
and the momentum-operator p_{op} = - i \hbar \nabla respectively the position-operator r in position space:

[H,p_{op}] = -i \hbar (V(r,t) \nabla - \nabla V(r,t)) = i \hbar \nabla V(r,t)

and

[H,r] = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} (\Delta r - r \Delta) = - \frac{\hbar^2}{m} \nabla

so i don't understand how to get these results. it looks nearly like the use of the product rule but the signs don't match and especially in equation two: how does the laplace-operator become a nabla?

sorry if this problem is obviously but i dont't see it.

thanks and greetings.
tommy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Working in one dimension for simplicity:

[H,p] = [V,p]=-i\hbar(V \frac{d}{dx} - \frac{d}{dx} V)

Now, the operator d/dx V corresponds to first applying the operator V (multiplying the wavefunction by V) and then the operator d/dx. It might help to use a test function:

\frac{d}{dx} V f = \frac{d}{dx} (Vf) = \frac{dV}{dx} f + V \frac{df}{dx}

So that, in terms of operators:

\frac{d}{dx} V = \frac{dV}{dx} + V \frac{d}{dx}

Note the first term on the RHS is different from the LHS: it just says to multiply the wavefunction by the function dV/dx.

Plugging this in above:

[H,p] = -i\hbar(V \frac{d}{dx} - \frac{dV}{dx} - V\frac{d}{dx}) = i \hbar \frac{dV}{dx}

You can work out [H,x] similarly. I would recommend using a test function first.
 
thanks a lot,... i was blind ;)
greetings
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
943
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K