Compare aerodynmics of two cars

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jurgen M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Compare
Click For Summary
The Mercedes CLA has a lower drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.22 compared to the CLS C218's Cd of 0.26, primarily due to its shorter and more aerodynamic design. The CLA's features, such as narrow tires and a flat bottom, contribute to its superior aerodynamics, while the CLS's wider tires and larger frontal area increase drag. Despite the CLS's longer and more streamlined shape, modifications like narrower tires could potentially improve its Cd. However, even with such modifications, the CLS may still consume more fuel due to its heavier weight and larger footprint. Ultimately, the CLA's design is more efficient in terms of aerodynamics compared to the CLS.
Jurgen M
Mercedes CLA has Cd =0.22(180 Blue Efficiency) and Cd=0.23(180).
CLS C218 has 0.26, but CLS has wide tires, no flat bottom and other aero features like CLA.

aero features of CLA:
https://www.car-engineer.com/mercedes-cla-is-the-most-aerodynamic-production-car-of-the-world/

If we compare just body shape ,do you think CLS has better Cd from CLA, for example if we put narrow tires, flat bottom etc maybe CLS will have even better Cd then CLA?

I ask this because CLA is short, rear roofline looks to stubby, rear window+trunk slope is too steep,this can cause flow separation or too steep slope induce low pressure at rear window+trunk.

CLS is longer, more streamlined siluetthe,rear end slope is not so steep.

all-building-facade-moscow-russia-august-232195598.jpg
mercedes-benz-cla-c117-45-amg-2013-379557.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jurgen M said:
...
If we compare just body shape ,do you think CLS has better Cd from CLA, for example if we put narrow tires, flat bottom etc maybe CLS will have even better Cd then CLA?

I ask this because CLA is short, rear roofline looks to stubby, rear window+trunk slope is too steep,this can cause flow separation or too steep slope induce low pressure at rear window+trunk.

CLS is longer, more streamlined siluetthe,rear end slope is not so steep.
Modifying the CLS C218 car, you could reduce the factory's Cd.

1) The CLS has wide tires because it weights around 1950 kgf, compared to the 1540 kgf of the CA.
2) It also has a frontal footprint area about 4% bigger than the CA.
3) Being longer, it has more drag caused only by skin friction.

Because those three factors mentioned above only, it will still use more fuel after you improve its Cd to match the CA's Cd of 0.22.
 
Lnewqban said:
Modifying the CLS C218 car, you could reduce the factory's Cd.

1) The CLS has wide tires because it weights around 1950 kgf, compared to the 1540 kgf of the CA.
2) It also has a frontal footprint area about 4% bigger than the CA.
3) Being longer, it has more drag caused only by skin friction.

Because those three factors mentioned above only, it will still use more fuel after you improve its Cd to match the CA's Cd of 0.22.
I mean if we compare only car body, which will have better Cd..
 
its always been a dream of mine to visit the stars and now that I'm old enough and in a levels i wanted to send a bit of myself to space in a rocked like a hair or something but I've ran into some problems and came here to ask for your opinions on what fuel i should use and what material i should use the the shell of rocket as am only in first year a levels so any suggestions would be much appreciated and the fuel will take up about 90 percent mass and launch the rocket about 830Km the maths...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K