Completeness of the eigenfunctions (Which vectorspace?)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Runei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunctions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian operator form a complete set in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically within the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. In the one-dimensional case, for systems like the infinite square well, the eigenfunctions are countably infinite and represented by sine functions. Conversely, for a free particle, the eigenfunctions are continuous and represented by complex exponentials. In certain scenarios, such as a spinning electron in a magnetic field, the eigenfunctions can form a finite complete set, represented by two-component spinors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hilbert spaces and square-integrable functions
  • Knowledge of eigenfunctions and their role in quantum systems
  • Basic concepts of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian for various quantum systems
  • Explore the concept of Rigged Hilbert spaces and their applications
  • Investigate perturbation theory and its implications on wavefunctions
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working on perturbation theory and eigenfunction analysis.

Runei
Messages
193
Reaction score
17
Completeness of the eigenfunctions (Which vectorspace??)

Once again in need of brain power from the interwebz :)

So I get that the eigenfunctions to the hamiltonoperator forms a complete set, but I'm unsure now as to which vectorspace it is?

And we're talking the one-dimensional case!

My first guess would be that it is all the functions that are summable? But that doesn't completely satisfy me, since I know from Fourier Series and Fourier Transform know that any summable function can be written as an infinite sum of complex exponentials, and the eigenfunctions to the hamiltonian are a finite set?

Maybe someone can give me the hints of what I need to look at, to get a full understanding?

Right now I'm working with perturbation theory, and I'm trying to reconcile myself with the fact that the the first order correction to the wavefunction can be written as a linear combination of the solutions (eigenfunctions) to the unperturbed hamiltonoperator.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy eigenfunctions form a basis for the vector space of the wave functions. Wave functions are in general complex and they are quadratically integrable.
 
Runei said:
...and the eigenfunctions to the hamiltonian are a finite set?

No they aren't, at least not in general. If we consider an infinite square well with the usual Hamiltonian ##\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 + V(x)## then the eigenfunctions ##|n \rangle## will range over all ##n \in \mathbb{N}## with periodic boundary conditions at the ends of the well resulting in ##\langle x |n \rangle \propto \sin(\frac{n\pi x}{a})##. Here we have a countably infinite set of energy eigenfunctions. For a free particle, ##\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2##, we have the eigenfunctions ##\langle x | \psi_k \rangle \propto e^{ikx}## ranging over all real ##k## so we have a continuous energy spectrum.

On the other hand, say we have a spinning electron at rest (meaning it is in a momentum eigenstate and we boost to the frame in which the momentum eigenvalue vanishes) in a uniform magnetic field ##\vec{B} = B \hat{z}## relative to the axes of a coordinate system and we are interested only in the spin evolution of the electron. Then the Hamiltonian ##\hat{H} = \propto B S_z## corresponds to that of the spin component of our system. It is time-independent and its eigenfunctions are just those of ##S_z## i.e. the two-component spinors. So here the eigenfunctions constitute a finite complete set.

In most cases the underlying vector space will just be the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. However this isn't always true e.g. in the case of the free particle the space is actually an associated Rigged Hilbert space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
18K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K