Completeness Relation in Quantum Mechanics Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter nolanp2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
Click For Summary
A completeness relation in quantum mechanics indicates that a complete set of functions can be used to express any wavefunction within the same boundary conditions. This is mathematically represented by the equation ψ(x) = ∑_n a_nφ_n(x), where φ_n(x) are the complete functions. A complete set satisfies the relation ∑_n φ_n(x)φ_n(y) = δ(x-y), which is essential for decomposing wavefunctions. The completeness relation also corresponds to the identity operator, as shown in J. J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics." Understanding this concept is crucial for applying quantum mechanics effectively.
nolanp2
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
can someone please give me a quick description/definition of a completeness relation in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here you can get some info:

http://phyastweb.la.asu.edu/phy576-schmidt/dirac/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
very roughly: if a set of functions are "complete", then you can always expand a function with the same boundary conditions in terms of these functions:

<br /> \{\phi_n(x)\} {\rm complete} \Rightarrow \psi(x)=\sum_n a_n\phi_n(x)<br />

In particular, if you can find a set of energy eigenfunctions (which are complete due to theorems about hermitian operators on Hilbert spaces), you can always decompose any wavefunction in terms of them. This is very useful.

Slightly more formally, a complete set of functions satisfies:

<br /> \sum_n \phi_n(x)\phi_n(y)=\delta(x-y) <br />

The above follows (more or less) from these hypotheses.
 
  • Like
Likes Zacarias Nason
If you search the internet for the "spectral decomposition theorem", I'm sure you'll get many useful results.
 
This old thread keeps popping up in Google, so ...

Quoting from J. J. Sakurai - Modern Quantum Mechanics, Sec. 1.3
... we must have

\sum_{a&#039;} \left| a&#039; \right\rangle \left\langle a&#039; \right| = 1 (1.3.11)

where the 1 on the right-hand side is to be understood as the identity operator. Equation (1.3.11) is known as the completeness relation or closure.

The \left| a&#039; \right\rangle signify orthonormal eigenkets. The above sum is a useful mathematical tool as it can be inserted wherever the identity operator could appropriately be inserted. Check out the book!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
888
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K