Relativistic quantum mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between relativistic quantum mechanics, specifically the Dirac and Klein-Gordon equations, and the Schrödinger equation. Participants explore the implications of formulating these equations in Minkowski 4-space and the necessity of mass terms in the context of special relativity (SR) and quantum mechanics (QM).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why mass terms are required in the Dirac and Klein-Gordon equations for unifying QM and SR, suggesting that the formulation in Minkowski 4-space should suffice.
  • Others argue that while a massless Klein-Gordon equation exists, a mass term is necessary for studying massive particles.
  • It is noted that the mass term in the Dirac equation couples the spinor components, and the massless Dirac equation is referred to as the Weyl equation.
  • Some participants assert that the Schrödinger equation (SDE) is fundamentally not Lorentz invariant due to its second derivative of time and first derivative with respect to space.
  • There are claims that the Schrödinger equation, when formulated in Minkowski 4-space, incorporates special relativity, and that the Dirac equation is not more relativistic than the Schrödinger equation.
  • Participants discuss the implications of Lorentz invariance, noting that energy is not a 4-vector and thus not Lorentz invariant.
  • One participant mentions that the SDE can be shown to be the non-relativistic limit of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations.
  • There are assertions that the Schrödinger equation is a subset of the Dirac equation, and discussions about the relevance of components of 4-vectors in the context of relativistic theories.
  • Some participants express confusion about the claims made regarding the relationship between the Dirac and Schrödinger equations, leading to requests for clarification and references.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the necessity of mass terms in relativistic equations, the Lorentz invariance of the Schrödinger equation, and the relationship between the Dirac and Schrödinger equations. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the discussion involves complex technical arguments about the properties of 4-vectors, Lorentz invariance, and the implications of formulating equations in Minkowski space. There are unresolved assumptions about the nature of relativistic equations and their formulations.

  • #31
For example, the Dirac equations should be of the form:
$$(\partial_0 - \partial_1 + i\partial_2)\psi_1 + \partial_3 \psi_2 = - im\psi_4$$
Plus three more similar equations. There's no immediate way to decouple these: they are fundamentally equations for a four-component spinor. Certainly the SDE is nowhere to be seen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Sure you get the non-relativistic limit by a formal expansion with respect to powers of ##1/c##, and also choosing a convenient representations for the Dirac matrices to do that. E.g., if you minimally couple the em. field you are lead to the Pauli equation with a Pauli spinor (throughing away the anti particles). All this can be found in Bjorken&Drell.
 
  • #33
redtree said:
the Schrödinger equation is a component of the Dirac equation

No, it isn't, it's a non-relativistic approximation to it, as has already been pointed out.

The OP question has been answered. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
807
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K