Complex Analysis - Proving an analytic function f(z) is constant

Click For Summary
An analytic function f(z) in the complex plane is shown to be constant under the condition that its real part U(x,y) is a monotonic function of its imaginary part V(x,y). By applying the Cauchy-Riemann equations, the relationship between the derivatives of U and V leads to the conclusion that both ∂v/∂x and ∂v/∂y must equal zero. This implies that the imaginary part V is constant, which in turn indicates that the real part U must also be constant. Consequently, the function f(z) is determined to be constant throughout the complex plane. The proof effectively utilizes the properties of monotonic functions and the chain rule in differentiation.
Daized
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f(z) be an analytic function in the complex plane ℂ, and let \phi be amonotonic function of a real variable.

Assume that U(x,y) = \phi(V(x,y)) where U(x,y) is the real part of f(z) and V(x,y) is the imaginary part of f(z). Prove that f is constant.

Homework Equations



The analytic function f(z) is constant if f'(z)= 0 everywhere.

The Cauchy Riemann equation...

∂u/∂x=∂v/∂y,∂v/∂x=−∂u/∂y

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm honestly a bit lost on where to start. I know that if f(z) is analytic then it is differentiable, so I thought that using the Cauchy Riemann equations for the partial derivatives might be helpful where U_{x}=V_{y} and U_{y}=-V_{x}, but I don't know how to work with these when the function \phi is there.

Just any information on what theory is best to look at would be helpful. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
simply substitute into the C-R equation and make use of the chain rule of taking derivatives. Also note that phi is monotonic (amonotonic=a monotonic, as I assume), so that phi'≠0
 
Actually managed to figure it out just about

Assume that f(z) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y).

We know that u(x, y) = ϕ(v(x, y)).

By Cauchy-Riemann, we have
∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y ==> ϕ'(v(x,y)) * ∂v/∂x = ∂v/∂y, and
∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x ==> ϕ'(v(x,y)) * ∂v/∂y = -∂v/∂x.

Substituting the first equation into the second equation yields
ϕ'(v(x,y)) * [ϕ'(v(x,y)) * ∂v/∂x] = -∂v/∂x
==> [(ϕ'(v(x,y)))^2 + 1] ∂v/∂x = 0.
==> ∂v/∂x = 0, since (ϕ'(v(x,y)))^2 + 1 is nonzero.

Substituting this into the first equation yields ∂v/∂y = 0.

Since ∂v/∂x = ∂v/∂y = 0, we conclude by Cauchy-Riemann that ∂u/∂x = ∂u/∂y = 0 as well.
Hence, both u and v are constant.
Therefore, f = u + iv is also constant.

Thanks though.
 
good work, better than what I did.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K