Complex Number Graph : x^5 = 1

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of complex numbers, specifically focusing on the equation x5 = 1. Participants explore the implications of this equation regarding the absolute value and angle of x, as well as the nature of its solutions in the context of complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the implications of x5 = 1, particularly regarding the absolute value and angle of x.
  • One participant suggests that the absolute value of x must be 1 since the power is odd, but questions the meaning of "factors" in this context.
  • Another participant points out that there are five distinct solutions to the equation x5 = 1, including complex solutions represented in polar form.
  • One participant introduces De Moivre's theorem to explain the nth roots of unity and provides the specific solutions for the case of n = 5.
  • A later reply challenges the reasoning behind the number of solutions, asking why solutions can’t extend beyond the five identified.
  • Participants clarify that additional angles would not yield new solutions, as they would repeat existing ones.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are five solutions to the equation x5 = 1, but there is some debate regarding the reasoning behind the number of solutions and the interpretation of absolute values and angles in the context of complex numbers.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and properties of complex numbers, particularly in relation to their graphical representation and the application of De Moivre's theorem. There are also unresolved questions about the implications of the absolute value and angles of complex numbers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals seeking to understand the properties of complex numbers, particularly in relation to roots of unity and their graphical representation in the complex plane.

jlpmghrs
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Read the post first, then look at the graphs - https://picasaweb.google.com/104328...ey=Gv1sRgCIe1gv_A_bT__wE#5621389108478505394"
Well this is the question...and I don't understand it very well :

Suppose you know that x raised to the fifth power is 1. What can you say about x's absolute value? (remember that the absolute value of a product is the product of the absolute values of its factors.) What can you say about x's angle? (remember that the angle of a product is the sum of the angles of its factors.)

This is what I based my first graph on :
the 1st statement means : x5 = 1 ...right?
2nd : well I can say it's absolute value is 1 since the power is odd, and therefore, |x| = 1. But I didn't do any product of factors (what factors?? ...do they mean 1*1*1*1*1?). I mean I don't get what they're asking AT ALL! :cry:
3rd : well the graph shows a zero degree angle. and we can also get 0 by doing
(imaginary number part/real number part) = (0/1) = 0. but again here, what factors are they talking about? :confused:

Now, this is about complex numbers right?? So that's what made me do the second graph, although i don't see it as correct at all, since it would be (x+i)5. Well, I basically did some rubbish here. I'm not sure what even made me do it.

This has really been killing me. I know it's probably really really simple. But I feel like such a fool for not even understanding a bit of the question :mad:

PLEASE HELP ME :cry:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jlpmghrs said:
Read the post first, then look at the graphs - https://picasaweb.google.com/104328...ey=Gv1sRgCIe1gv_A_bT__wE#5621389108478505394"
Well this is the question...and I don't understand it very well :

Suppose you know that x raised to the fifth power is 1. What can you say about x's absolute value? (remember that the absolute value of a product is the product of the absolute values of its factors.) What can you say about x's angle? (remember that the angle of a product is the sum of the angles of its factors.)

This is what I based my first graph on :
the 1st statement means : x5 = 1 ...right?
2nd : well I can say it's absolute value is 1 since the power is odd, and therefore, |x| = 1. But I didn't do any product of factors (what factors?? ...do they mean 1*1*1*1*1?). I mean I don't get what they're asking AT ALL! :cry:
3rd : well the graph shows a zero degree angle. and we can also get 0 by doing
(imaginary number part/real number part) = (0/1) = 0. but again here, what factors are they talking about? :confused:

Now, this is about complex numbers right?? So that's what made me do the second graph, although i don't see it as correct at all, since it would be (x+i)5. Well, I basically did some rubbish here. I'm not sure what even made me do it.

This has really been killing me. I know it's probably really really simple. But I feel like such a fool for not even understanding a bit of the question :mad:

PLEASE HELP ME :cry:

You seem to think that 1 is the only number such that x5=1. This is not true. For example

[tex]\cos(\frac{2\pi}{5})+i\sin(\frac{2\pi}{5})[/tex]

also has this property. In fact, there are 5 such a numbers such that x5=1.

Let me solve the first problem for you to let you see what they're after. If we know that x5=1 and if we take the absolute value of these things then we get

[tex]|x^5|=|x|^5=1[/tex]

But now we are working with real numbers, and there is only one real number such that it yields 1 when raised to the fifth power. Thus |x|=1.

Now, can you do something similar with the angles?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to PF, jlpmghrs! :smile:

Yes. This is about complex numbers.
It seems as if you're lacking a bit of knowledge about how those work.
To learn that, you really need a book or perhaps the wiki page.

I'll give you a few pointers though to help with your immediate problem.

Any complex number z can be represented in the X-Y plane as a point, with a distance r to the origin, and with an angle phi with the positive x-axis (the "real" axis).

We write it as:
[tex]z = r e^{i \phi}[/tex]

Yes, that is the "regular" exponential function, and calculations with it work exactly like normal calculations with the exponential function.
(For now, I'm assuming you know about exponentiation and the mathematical constant e. :wink:)

In particular the absolute value of a complex number is the distance to the origin, which is r.
Obviously this is always at least zero.

In your case you have [itex]z^5 = 1[/itex],
meaning:
[tex]z^5 = (r e^{i \phi})^5 = r^5 e^{5 i \phi}[/tex]

This means that [itex]z^5 = 1[/itex] has a total of 5 solutions of which only 1 is real.
The solutions are:
[tex]1, \quad e^{\frac {2\pi i} 5}, \quad e^{\frac {4\pi i} 5}, \quad e^{\frac {6\pi i} 5}, \quad e^{\frac {8\pi i} 5}[/tex]

In particular the absolute value is 1.
 
Say, don't know much about this, but allow me to ask a "devil's advocate" question...

"I like Serena": why is it a total of 5 solutions? Why can't you keep going like:
[tex]\quad e^{\frac {10\pi i} 5}, \quad e^{\frac {12\pi i} 5} ...[/tex]
 
gsal said:
Say, don't know much about this, but allow me to ask a "devil's advocate" question...

"I like Serena": why is it a total of 5 solutions? Why can't you keep going like:
[tex]\quad e^{\frac {10\pi i} 5}, \quad e^{\frac {12\pi i} 5} ...[/tex]

Because they don't give new solutions. For example: [itex]e^{\frac{10\pi i}{5}}=1[/itex]. Remember that [itex]\frac{10\pi}{5}[/itex] denoted an angle. And it turns out that that angle is equal to 0:

[tex]\frac{10\pi}{5}=2\pi=0[/tex]

Thus [itex]e^{\frac{10\pi i}{5}}=e^0=1[/itex].

The other thingies will also not give new solutions...
 
Hey thank you guys soo much :) I'm new here and I'm really happy to have help :D

@gsal : according to demoivre's theorem the nth roots of unity are given by : cis (2kpi/n), where k = 0, 1, 2,..., (n-1)

So here,

z5 {n being 5} = Cos(0) + iSin(0), Cos(1.2.pi/5) + iSin(1.2.pi/5), Cos(2.2.pi/5 ) + iSin(4pi/5), Cos(3.2.pi/5) + iSin(6pi/5), Cos(4.2.pi/5) + iSin(8pi/5)

= 1, cis(2pi/5), cis(4pi/5), cis(6pi/5), cis(8pi/5)

And why it only goes upto (n-1) is explained by micromass.

i.e. Cos(5.2.pi/5) + iSin(5.2.pi/5) = Cos 2pi + iSin 2pi = (which gives you again) 1.

Thanks again to everyone :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K