Complex semidefinite programming

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peterlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Programming
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the principles of complex semidefinite programming (SDP), specifically examining whether results applicable to real SDP also hold for complex SDP when replacing real symmetric matrices with Hermitian matrices. The primal and dual forms of SDP remain structurally similar, and interior-point methods designed for real SDP are applicable to complex SDP. The discussion emphasizes the feasibility of rewriting algorithms that utilize Hermitian matrices as double-sized real matrices, ensuring that the foundational principles of numerical analysis remain intact.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semidefinite programming (SDP) concepts
  • Familiarity with Hermitian matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of interior-point methods in optimization
  • Basic skills in numerical analysis and matrix algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the application of interior-point methods for complex semidefinite programming
  • Study the transformation of Hermitian matrices to double-sized real matrices
  • Investigate the implications of complex SDP in numerical optimization
  • Review case studies where complex SDP has been successfully implemented
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, mathematicians, and practitioners in optimization, particularly those working with semidefinite programming and complex numerical analysis.

peterlam
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
For semidefinite programming (SDP), we have the primal and dual forms as:

primal

min <C,X>
s.t. <A_i,X> = b_i, i=1,...,m
X>=0

dual

max <b,y>
s.t. y_1*A_1 + ... + y_m*A_m <=C

where the data A_i and C are assumed to be real symmetric matrices in many textbooks and online materials.

If we consider complex SDP where A_i and C are Hermitian, will all the results about real SDP be correct by replacing the real matrices to Hermitian matrices? To be precious, will the primal and dual forms be still the same? Do the interior-point methods for real SDP work for complex SDP?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have slightly lost me in a forest of unfamiliar notation and jargon, but mostly in numerical analysis anything that works for real symmetric matrices will also work for complex Hermitian matrices.

You can often rewrite algorithms that use Hermitian matrices using double-sized real matrices, replacing every matrix [itex]z = x + iy[/itex] with

[tex]\bmatrix{x & y \cr -y & x}[/tex]

and the obvious corresponding thing for vectors.

So my advce would be just try it on a problem where you can verify the answer some other way, and I would be happy to bet a few dollars it will work fine.

(BTW I can't figure out why my matrix doesn't have a closing bracket!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K