Complex Sin value greater than 1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tim9000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Sin Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the sine and cosine functions when applied to complex arguments, specifically addressing the case where Sin(theta) = 3.08 and Cos(theta) = -i*2.91. Participants explore the implications of these values, the nature of complex trigonometric functions, and the conditions under which they can exceed traditional bounds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the sine value exceeding 1, suggesting it might relate to multiple rotations.
  • Another participant asserts that there is no real theta for which sin(theta) = 3.08, and challenges the comparison of complex numbers to real numbers.
  • Several participants clarify that cosine can yield complex values when the argument is complex, citing examples like cos(5i + 2).
  • It is noted that for real arguments, sin(a) is constrained within [-1, 1], but for imaginary arguments, the behavior changes significantly.
  • One participant presents a formula for theta based on the given sine value, indicating that both positive and negative imaginary cosine values are possible.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between sine and cosine for complex arguments, emphasizing that the traditional identity sin^2(theta) + cos^2(theta) = 1 still holds but with complex implications.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of having a sine value greater than 1 and how it affects the corresponding cosine value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the interpretation of the sine and cosine values when they exceed traditional bounds. There is no consensus on the implications of these values, and multiple views on the nature of complex trigonometric functions are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the traditional bounds of sine and cosine do not apply in the same way when dealing with complex arguments. The discussion includes various mathematical identities and relationships that are not universally agreed upon, leading to differing interpretations of the results.

tim9000
Messages
866
Reaction score
17
Hi,
My Complex Euler stuff is a bit rusty but I'm working on a problem (that I won't mention here) but I'm after an explanation as to how:

Sin (theta) = 3.08 and so
Cos (theta) = -i*2.91


What's throwing me is that I know Sin can only have a max at 1 trigonometrically (obviously) so I'm assuming 3 is something to do with like 3 rotations, but I could be wrong. I was also thinking like the 0.08 would be 4.6 degrees for theta. And I tried rearranging e^i*theata = CiS as
e^i*theta - sin (theta) = -i*cos(theta) but that doesn't help.

Any explanations?

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're asking. There is no theta such that sin(theta) = 3.08 (to my knowledge) and it is completely wrong to say that -i*2.91 is "less than" 1.
 
Cosx=(Exp(ix)+Exp(-ix))/2

Cos(ix)=(Exp(-x)+Exp(x))/2

The cosine function will never give you a complex number.
 
HomogenousCow said:
Cosx=(Exp(ix)+Exp(-ix))/2

Cos(ix)=(Exp(-x)+Exp(x))/2

The cosine function will never give you a complex number.

He is talking about complex arguments. I think we can all agree that cos(5i + 2) is complex.
 
Right yes, forgot about the general a+bi case
 
We can say that:
For real a:
sin(a) is in [-1,1]

For imaginary x:
sin(bi) is imaginary, and so there is no well defined notion of a less than or greater than comparison to real numbers.

For complex a + bi (that are not one of the above cases)
sin(a + bi) is complex, and so there is no well defined notion of a less than or greater than comparison to real numbers.

In any case, sin(x) is never greater than 1.
 
^not quite
sin(a+b i)
is zero when a,b=0
real when b or cos(a)=0
cos(a)=0
imaginary when sin(a)=0and complex otherwise

|e^(i theta)|=1
only holds for theta real
if theta is complex it does not hold
sin(theta)^2+cos(theta)^2=1
still holds but complex squares can be negative

if
Sin (theta) = 3.08 and so
Cos (theta) = -i*2.91
theta=(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)
where n is any (rational) integer
this ignores round off 3.08^2-2.91^2=1.0183
when it should be 1
 
lurflurf said:
^not quite
sin(a+b i)
is zero when a,b=0
real when b or cos(a)=0
cos(a)=0
imaginary when sin(a)=0


and complex otherwise

|e^(i theta)|=1
only holds for theta real
if theta is complex it does not hold
sin(theta)^2+cos(theta)^2=1
still holds but complex squares can be negative

if
Sin (theta) = 3.08 and so
Cos (theta) = -i*2.91
theta=(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)
where n is any (rational) integer
this ignores round off 3.08^2-2.91^2=1.0183
when it should be 1

Oh, OK. Sorry for the misinformation then.
 
Thanks for the great replies everyone, I'm going to have another read through them again but the general sense I'm getting is that the theata can't be broken up so that the amplitude of sin is less than 1. This leads me to think that I'm going to have to treat Sin(theta) and Cos(theta) as variables completely.

lurflurf, I should have specified that I'm not trying to find theta necessarily, more to deduce how we got to the Cos value. (But out of pure interest, what relation did you use to show theta=(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)?)
I tried the trig relation you reminded me of and rearranged for Cos but it didn't make much sense:
sin^2 (theta) + cos^2 (theta) = 1 then
cos(theta) = SQRT(1 - sin^2(theta)) = i*2.913 Which is correct but positive though.
Thanks,
P.S
Surprisingly I'm just not seeing how:
Cosx=(Exp(ix)+Exp(-ix))/2
And
Cos(ix)=(Exp(-x)+Exp(x))/2

Can get me from Sin (theta) = 3.08 to Cos (theta) = -i*2.91...

Is there any significance of it being greater than 1, like the rotations or something like I thought, or just some mathematical freakery?
 
  • #10
sin^2 (theta) + cos^2 (theta) = 1
holds when theta is complex
the thing about sin(theta)<=1 follows from that and the assumption that sin(theta) and cos(theta) are real
Sin (theta) = 3.08 tells us
cos^2 (theta)=1-sin^2 (theta)=-8.8464
you said Cos (theta) = -i*2.91
Cos (theta) = i*2.91
is also possible when sin(theta)=3.08
if Cos (theta) = i*2.91
theta=-(2n+1)pi/2+i*arccosh(3.08)
where n is any (rational) integer
knowing sin(theta) or cos(theta) allows us to find the other up to sign
anyway
sin(a+bi)=sin(a)cosh(b)+i*cos(a)sinh(b)
because
sin(a+bi)=sin(a)cos(i*b)+cos(a)sin(i*b)
and
cos(i*b)=cosh(b)
sin(i*b)=i*sinh(b)
 
  • #11
Oh I see.
But so you're saying Cos (theta) = -i*2.91 was wrong, in that it should have been positive in the first place?

Thanks!
 
  • #12
No
cos (theta) = -i*2.91
cos (theta) = i*2.91
are both possible given
sin(theta)=3.08
we cannot know which value we have without more information
 
  • #13
Ooh, right. Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K