Compton Scattering and Conservation of Momentum

In summary, the homework statement is that the photon scatter angle is theta, and the electron recoil angle is phi. To prove the equation, you eliminate hf from the equations. You can either use the half-angle formulas or solve the equation in terms of θ.
  • #1
Nusc
760
2

Homework Statement



photon scatter angle is theta, electron recoil angle is phi

prove

tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Conservation of energy is the same as in here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scattering


Conservation of Momentum

In x :

p_gamma = p_gamma' cos(theta) + p_e' cos(phi)

In y:

0 = p_gamma' sin(theta) - p_e' sin(phi)

p_gamma'=p_e' sin(phi)/sin(theta)


Let's solve for p_e'^2 since we can directly substitute it in the energy term.

p_e'^2 = p_gamma^2 sin^2(theta)/ [sin^2(phi)cos^2(theta) + 2 sin(phi)cos(theta)sin(theta)cos(phi) + sin^2(theta)cos^2(phi)]

I'm not sure where the cot(theta/2) comes from which we want to show.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is the problem at least set up correctly?
 
  • #4
If I'm to prove tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)

Would you have any idea where the hf' disappears if you look at the energy equations in the wikipedia link?
 
  • #5
In a frams S, two identical particles with electric charge q move abreast along lines parallel to the x-axis, a distance r apart and with velocity v. Determine the force in S that each exerts on the other, by use of the force law for a uniformly moving charge.



I would need a lorentz forc e law in 4 vector notation,

what is it? Then where do I proceed?
 
  • #6
Nusc said:
If I'm to prove


tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)

Would you have any idea where the hf' disappears if you look at the energy equations in the wikipedia link?
Well, you have 3 equations (x-momentum, y-momentum, energy). The idea is to use those 3 equations to eliminate 2 of the variables -- hf' and p_e'. That will leave you with just hf, θ, and φ in a single equation. The problem is in working out the algebra to get there.

Nusc said:
In a frams S, two identical particles with electric charge q move abreast along lines parallel to the x-axis, a distance r apart and with velocity v. Determine the force in S that each exerts on the other, by use of the force law for a uniformly moving charge.



I would need a lorentz forc e law in 4 vector notation,

what is it? Then where do I proceed?
I recommend starting a new thread for this problem.
 
  • #7
[tex]
E_{\gamma} = hf
[/tex]
[tex]
E_{\gamma'} = hf'
[/tex]
[tex]

E_e = m_e c^2

[/tex]
[tex]

E_e'= \sqrt{ (p_e' c)^2 + (m_e c^2)^2 }
[/tex]
[tex]

hf + m_e c^2 = hf' + \sqrt{ (p_e' c^2)^2 + (m_e c^2)^2 }

[/tex]
[tex]

p_e'^2 c^ = (hf +m_e c^2 - hf')^2 - m_e^2 c^4
[/tex] Conservation of Momentum

In x :

[tex] p_\gamma = p_\gamma' cos(\theta) + p_e' cos(\phi)
[/tex]
In y:

[tex] 0 = p_{\gamma'} sin(\theta) - p_{e'} sin(\phi)
[/tex]
[tex]
p_{\gamma'}=p_{e'} sin(\phi)/sin(\theta)
[/tex]

Let's solve for p_e'^2 since we can directly substitute it in the energy term.
[tex]
p_e'^2 = p_{\gamma}^2 sin^2(\theta)/ [sin^2(\phi)cos^2(\theta) + 2 sin(\phi)cos(\theta)sin(\theta)cos(\phi) + sin^2(\theta)cos^2(\phi)]
[/tex]
I'm not sure where the cot(theta/2) comes from which we want to show.
 
  • #8
You still haven't eliminated pe from the equations yet.

I suggest changing the cot(θ/2) expression using the half-angle formulas (see my link in Post #3). Then the expression you are trying to prove will be in terms of θ, and you can stop wondering about the θ/2. Note, there are several different, equivalent expressions for cot(θ/2)
 
  • #9
Where do you see to eliminate hf'?
 
  • #10
Disclaimer: I have not actually solved this problem myself.
Nusc said:
Where do you see to eliminate hf'?
You can use the p_x and p_y equations to eliminate pe and get an expression for hf'. That expression can be substituted into the energy equation, eliminating hf'. HOWEVER -- the expression you get is very messy, and it's not obvious to me how to simplify it.

Another observation: if you take the energy equation and divide by mc2, the left-hand side becomes

1 + hf/(mc2),​

a term that appears in the result you are trying to prove. Maybe (I repeat: maybe) working with the equation in that form would help.

Have you recast the equation-to-be-proved in terms of θ, to get rid of the θ/2?
 
  • #11
The momentum conservation equations can be written as
[tex]p \: sin\phi=\frac{\epsilon '}{c}sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]p \: cos\phi=\frac{\epsilon}{c}-\frac{\epsilon '}{c}cos\theta[/tex]

from which

[tex]tan\phi=\frac{\epsilon 'sin\theta}{\epsilon-\epsilon ' cos\theta}[/tex]

where ε and ε' are the photon energies before and after the scattering process. Replace the wavelengths with energies in the Compton equation to get

[tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon '}-\frac{1}{\epsilon}=\frac{1-cos\theta}{mc^2}=\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}[/tex]

Solve this last equation for ε' and plug back in the tangent equation. You should get the answer without too much algebra. Don't forget to use the half-angle identities for theta.
 
  • #12
I've only gotten as close as:

[tex]

tan(\phi) = \frac{1}{mc^2 (\frac{sin(\theta)}{2\epsilon + cos^2(\theta)/sin^2(\theta))})}

[/tex]
 
  • #13
Something is wrong with that equation, which is evident by examining the units. In this expression:

2ε + cos2θ/sin2θ​

a term with units of energy is being added to a unitless quantity, which is not allowed. That indicates an error has been made somewhere.
 
  • #14
Nusc said:
I've only gotten as close as:

[tex]

tan(\phi) = \frac{1}{mc^2 (\frac{sin(\theta)}{2\epsilon + cos^2(\theta)/sin^2(\theta))})}

[/tex]

What is your expression for ε' when you solved for it?
 
  • #15
kuruman said:
What is your expression for ε' when you solved for it?

[tex]
\epsilon ' = (\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2} + \frac{1}{\epsilon})^{-1}
[/tex]

ah I see now, let me fix it

[tex]

tan(\phi) = \frac{sin(\theta)}{\frac{\epsilon}{\frac{2sin^{2}(\theta/2)}{mc^2}} +\frac{1}{\epsilon}}

[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #16
It still doesn't work dimensionally. It seems you have trouble adding fractions. Look

[tex]
\frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}
[/tex]

[tex]
\frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}{\epsilon \: mc^2}
[/tex]

[tex]\epsilon'=\frac{\epsilon \: mc^2}{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}[/tex]

Stick this in the expression for the tangent and see what happens. Be sure to add fractions and simplify correctly. If in doubt, do dimensional analysis on both sides.
 
  • #17
I got it thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
thanks for such an impressive discussion.. would you mind to post the whole final equation on here please ? i got some misunderstandings i think..
 
  • #19
I don't know if I understand your question. The whole final equation is already given in the problem statement:
Nusc said:
prove

tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)
In other words

[tex]\tan \phi = \frac{\cot(\theta/2)}{1 + \frac{hf}{mc^2}}[/tex]​

If you're trying to work this out yourself, show us how far you have gotten and where you're stuck. Then we'll know how to help.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
I just want to see the whole solution step by step with explanation in one post . so i can translate it to my own language and use in my lectures. if this is possible it would be great but if not it's ok. thank you again.
 
  • #21
parazit said:
I just want to see the whole solution step by step with explanation in one post . so i can translate it to my own language and use in my lectures. if this is possible it would be great but if not it's ok. thank you again.
Unfortunately, it is against our forum policy to provide step by step solutions to problems like this.

It has been nearly 1 year since I thought about this problem, but I think you can simply work out the details given the following posts from this thread:

Nusc said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Conservation of energy is the same as in here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scatteringConservation of Momentum

In x :

p_gamma = p_gamma' cos(theta) + p_e' cos(phi)

In y:

0 = p_gamma' sin(theta) - p_e' sin(phi)

p_gamma'=p_e' sin(phi)/sin(theta)
The wikipedia article gives the Compton equation (and its derivation):

be96ab723fc40e67a894b51f9d5457d8.png


kuruman said:
The momentum conservation equations can be written as
[tex]p \: sin\phi=\frac{\epsilon '}{c}sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]p \: cos\phi=\frac{\epsilon}{c}-\frac{\epsilon '}{c}cos\theta[/tex]

from which

[tex]tan\phi=\frac{\epsilon 'sin\theta}{\epsilon-\epsilon ' cos\theta}[/tex]

where ε and ε' are the photon energies before and after the scattering process. Replace the wavelengths with energies in the Compton equation to get

[tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon '}-\frac{1}{\epsilon}=\frac{1-cos\theta}{mc^2}=\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}[/tex]

Solve this last equation for ε' and plug back in the tangent equation. You should get the answer without too much algebra. Don't forget to use the half-angle identities for theta.

kuruman said:
[tex]
\frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}
[/tex]

[tex]
\frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}{\epsilon \: mc^2}
[/tex]

[tex]\epsilon'=\frac{\epsilon \: mc^2}{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}[/tex]

Stick this in the expression for the tangent and see what happens. Be sure to add fractions and simplify correctly. If in doubt, do dimensional analysis on both sides.
 
  • #22
it's ok, i understand you. actually this is the best way to keep our brains working :)
thank you again.
 

1. What is Compton scattering?

Compton scattering is a phenomenon in which a photon (an electromagnetic wave) collides with a charged particle, such as an electron, and loses some of its energy. This results in the photon being scattered in a different direction with a longer wavelength.

2. Why is Compton scattering important?

Compton scattering is important because it provides evidence for the particle nature of light and confirms the concept of conservation of momentum. It is also used in various areas of science, such as medical imaging and materials analysis.

3. How does Compton scattering demonstrate the conservation of momentum?

During Compton scattering, the total momentum of the system (photon and charged particle) remains constant before and after the collision. The change in momentum of the photon is equal and opposite to the change in momentum of the charged particle, demonstrating the conservation of momentum.

4. What is the equation for Compton scattering?

The equation for Compton scattering is Δλ = (h/mc)(1-cosθ), where Δλ is the change in wavelength of the scattered photon, h is Planck's constant, m is the mass of the charged particle, c is the speed of light, and θ is the angle of scatter.

5. How is Compton scattering used in medical imaging?

In medical imaging, Compton scattering is used in X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans. The X-rays are scattered by the tissues in the body, and the scattered photons are detected to create a 3D image of the internal structures. This allows for the detection of abnormalities or diseases in the body.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
169
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
553
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
435
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top