Compton Scattering Concept Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Compton scattering phenomenon, specifically addressing the presence of a y-component of momentum after the collision between a photon and an electron. It is established that while the incident photon has momentum solely in the x-direction, the total momentum in the y-direction remains zero post-collision, similar to a billiard ball collision. The conversation emphasizes the wave-particle duality of photons and clarifies that electrons also exhibit both particle and wave characteristics, despite being considered point-like in current physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Compton scattering and momentum conservation
  • Knowledge of wave-particle duality
  • Basic concepts of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework of Compton scattering
  • Explore the implications of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Study momentum conservation laws in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Investigate the current theories regarding the structure of electrons
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in quantum mechanics, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of particle interactions and momentum conservation in Compton scattering.

godtripp
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I had an issue with compton scattering that I never received a satisfactory answer for. My issue was that after the collision, there exists a y component of momentum... but all diagrams of the compton effect align the axis center to center from the photon to the electron and on top of that each are dimensionless point particles.

So where does this y-component come from? Does the wave nature of the photon give the particle some y component of momentum or is it all in the x direction?

Hope i was clear enough...thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electron and a photon are not point particles. If they were, the classical description would be eneough, instead you know that QM is required.
Also note that the concept "being a point particle" depends on the kind and energy of the interaction too.
 
If I understand you correctly you wonder why there can be a y-component of the momentum after the collision when the incident photon only has momentum in the x-direction.

The answer is that the total momentum in the y-direction after the collision is the same as before, zero. The momenta of the electron and the photon together add up to zero after the collision. This is essentialy analogous to one billiard ball hitting another - the two balls may go off in different directions (i.e. not straight forward) after the collision even though the incoming ball only travels in the 'straight forward'-direction. Was that answer to your question?

Also, as far as we know today, the electron is point-like and has no internal structure (of course this might change with future theories). The photon on the other hand is a different story. It shows a so called wave-particle duality, behaving both as a particle and a wave.
 
Thanks for your answers guys!
 
kloptok said:
Also, as far as we know today, the electron is point-like and has no internal structure (of course this might change with future theories). The photon on the other hand is a different story. It shows a so called wave-particle duality, behaving both as a particle and a wave.
Only the photon has wave-particle duality? :smile:
 
lightarrow said:
Only the photon has wave-particle duality? :smile:

Dang, you got me! :blushing: The thing was that I got the impression that the tread opener only thought of the photon as a point particle. But sure, the electron, as every particle, shows particle as well as wave behavior.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
767
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K