Compton scattering in MCNP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salman Khan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electron yield of materials like Aluminium and Au-79 when exposed to incident photons of 2 MeV energy. The user is utilizing specific tally methods (F11 for incident photons and F21 for emitted electrons) to derive the yield. There is a mention of the necessity of using a physics card (phy card) for accurate results, particularly regarding Compton scattering, which is identified as a special reaction. The proposed tally method is untested but aims to quantify total Compton events per source photon. The user shares their simulation setup, including source definitions and material compositions, to facilitate the calculation.
Salman Khan
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
I am interested to find the electron yield of a material like Aluminium by incident photon of energy let say 2 Me. I used
Mode p e
And tally
F11: e accros desired surface
F21: p across desired surface
only to find its value. Is it necessary to use phy card as well or no need of it. Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It depends on exactly the question you want to answer, but incoherent (Compton) scattering is special reaction number -1 for photons. So the following UNTESTED tally might work for the total number of Compton events per source photon.
Code:
f4:p <cell number>
sd4 1.0 $ Not the per unit volume answer. The total.
fm4 -1 <material in the cell> -1
 
Basically I want to find the electron yield of Au-79 by incident gamma photon of energy 2 Mev using point gamma source. Here if I use mode p e and if i use tallis F11:p (incident photon on front plate of AU-79) and F21:e (emitted electron by Au-79 due to incident photon). Yield=F21:e/F11:p. My sdef card will be like
Sdef Erg=2 parr=2 pos=0 0 30
m1 79000 -1
m2 air composition
Mode p e
Nps 1000000
print
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
979
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
904
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top