Computation of the ratio of barometric pressure

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of barometric pressure between Custer Peak and the bottom of the Homestake gold mine using the barometric formula, specifically $P=P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g g h}{kT}}$. The correct gravitational acceleration, $g=9.81 \,\text{m/s}^2$, is essential for ensuring the exponent is dimensionless. The final computed ratio of barometric pressures is approximately 0.8721, indicating that if the pressure at the Homestake mine is 1.25 bar, the pressure at Custer Peak would be around 1.09 bar. The discussion also clarifies the importance of unit conversion in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the barometric formula and its components
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration and its role in pressure calculations
  • Familiarity with SI units and unit conversion
  • Basic principles of ideal gas behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the barometric formula in atmospheric science
  • Learn about the impact of altitude on atmospheric pressure and its implications for breathing
  • Explore the significance of unit conversions in scientific calculations
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on gas behavior using the ideal gas law
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in atmospheric science, physics, and engineering, particularly those interested in barometric pressure calculations and the effects of altitude on atmospheric conditions.

WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
Hi,

The Homestake gold mine near Lead,South Dakota is excavated to 8000 feet below the surface. Lead is nearly a mile high; the bottom of the Homestake is about 900 m below sea level. Nearby custer peak is about 2100 m above sea level.

What is the ratio of barometric pressure on the top of the custer peak to the barometric pressure at the bottom of Homestake?
(Assume that the entire atmosphere is at 300 K and that it behaves as a single ideal gas whose molar mass is 29.

How to answer this question? The known barometric formula is $P=P_0 e^{-\frac{m_gh}{kT}}$ where T=temperature, k=Boltzmann's constant, $m_g$=mass of an individual atmospheric molecule.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can fill in 2100 m respectively -900 m into the formula to find the pressures. And then divide them to find the ratio.

Alternatively, we can first express the ratio as a formula and simplify it, and then evaluate it.
That is, let $h_1=2100\, m$ and $h_2=-900\,m$.
Then the requested ratio is:
$$\frac{P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g h_1}{kT}}}{P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g h_2}{kT}}}=e^{\frac{m_g h_2}{kT} - \frac{m_g h_1}{kT}}=e^{\frac{m_g}{kT}(h_2 - h_1)}$$
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
We can fill in 2100 m respectively -900 m into the formula to find the pressures. And then divide them to find the ratio.

Alternatively, we can first express the ratio as a formula and simplify it, and then evaluate it.
That is, let $h_1=2100\, m$ and $h_2=-900\,m$.
Then the requested ratio is:
$$\frac{P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g h_1}{kT}}}{P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g h_2}{kT}}}=e^{\frac{m_g h_2}{kT} - \frac{m_g h_1}{kT}}=e^{\frac{m_g}{kT}(h_2 - h_1)}$$
Hi,
So, $m_g=\frac{29 g}{6.02214e23mol^{-1}}=4.8155e-23 g, e^{\frac{4.8155e-23 g(900 m-2100 m)}{\frac{1.38065e-23J}{K}300 K}} $= $e^{-0.013951577 s^2/m}$

Now, what is the final ratio? What does this answer mean to the readers?
My other conclusions from the information given in this question are

1) South Dakota is about 1538.4 m above sea level.

2)Custer Peak is about 561.6 m above South Dakota.

Are these conclusions correct?
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
So, $m_g=\frac{29 g}{6.02214e23mol^{-1}}=4.8155e-23 g, e^{\frac{4.8155e-23 g(900 m-2100 m)}{\frac{1.38065e-23J}{K}300 K}} $= $e^{-0.013951577 s^2/m}$

There is something wrong with the units.
The exponent should be dimensionless.

From wiki, it appears the correct formula is $P=P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g g h}{kT}}$.
That is, with an extra $g= 9.81 \,\text{m/s}^2$ in it. Then the exponent will indeed be dimensionless.

Btw, the unit of the $29\,\text g$ should actually be $29\,\text g\cdot \text{mol}^{-1}$. Consequently, the $\text{mol}^{-1}$ cancels against the one in the denominator as it should.

Now, what is the final ratio? What does this answer mean to the readers?

We should find a ratio that is lower than 1 since the pressure high up is lower than a pressure deep down.
If it is close to 1, then the pressure is more or less that same at all altitudes in this range, and we can breathe normally at both altitudes.
If it is close to 0, then we won't be able to breathe normally at both altitudes. And water will boil at a noticeably different temperature.

My other conclusions from the information given in this question are
1) South Dakota is about 1538.4 m above sea level.
2) Custer Peak is about 561.6 m above South Dakota.
Are these conclusions correct?

Yep. Correct.
 
Last edited:
Klaas van Aarsen said:
There is something wrong with the units.
The exponent should be dimensionless.

From wiki, it appears the correct formula is $P=P_0 e^{-\frac{m_g g h}{kT}}$.
That is, with an extra $g= 9.81 \,\text{m/s}^2$ in it. Then the exponent will indeed be dimensionless.

Btw, the unit of the $29\,\text g$ should actually be $29\,\text g\cdot \text{mol}^{-1}$. Consequently, the $\text{mol}^{-1}$ cancels against the one in the denominator as it should.
We should find a ratio that is lower than 1 since the pressure high up is lower than a pressure deep down.
If it is close to 1, then the pressure is more or less that same at all altitudes in this range, and we can breathe normally at both altitudes.
If it is close to 0, then we won't be able to breathe normally at both altitudes. And water will boil at a noticeably different temperature.
Yep. Correct.
Hi,

Thanks for helping me in finding out the correct ratio of barometric pressure.. I wrongly omitted $g=9.81m/s^2$ in the barometric formula.

I got the answer dimensionless which is 0.8721. That means if there is 1.25 bar barometric pressure at the bottom of Homestake gold mine, then Custer Peak will have 1.09 bar barometric pressure.
 
answerto yahoo2.png


There is a mistake in my computaion of ratio. Correct ratio is as above.
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
View attachment 10805

There is a mistake in my computaion of ratio. Correct ratio is as above.
The formula with the substitution looks a bit off...
  1. The unit gram ($\text{g}$) should be converted to the SI unit $\text{kg}$ as part of the calculation.
  2. The gravitational acceleration $g=9.81\,\text{m/s}^2$ (not to be confused with the gram unit $\text{g}$) seems to be missing.
Note that I'm using an upright font for the unit gram and an italic font for the quantity of the gravitational acceleration to distinguish them. It's the recommended typography for SI units.

Either way, I also get $0.71$ so it seems that you did do the correct calculation.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K